District of Columbia Statutes
§ 11-2604 — Payment for representation.
District of Columbia § 11-2604
JurisdictionDistrict of Columbia
Title 11Organization and Jurisdiction of the Courts. [Enacted title]
Ch. 26Representation of Indigents in Criminal Cases.
This text of District of Columbia § 11-2604 (Payment for representation.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
D.C. Code § 11-2604 (2026).
Text
(a)Any attorney appointed pursuant to this chapter shall, at the conclusion of the representation or any segment thereof, be compensated an hourly rate not to exceed the rate payable under section 3006A(d)(1) of title 18, United States Code. Such attorney shall be reimbursed for expenses reasonably incurred.
(b)The compensation to be paid to an attorney appointed pursuant to this chapter shall not exceed the following maximum amounts:
(1)For representation of a defendant before the Superior Court of the District of Columbia for misdemeanors or felonies, the maximum amount set forth in section 3006A(d)(2) of title 18, United States Code, for representation of a defendant before the United States magistrate judge or the district court for misdemeanors or felonies (as the case may be).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Calloway v. District of Columbia
216 F.3d 1 (D.C. Circuit, 2000)
In Re Cleaver-Bascombe
892 A.2d 396 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2006)
Price Ex Rel. J.P. v. District of Columbia
792 F.3d 112 (D.C. Circuit, 2015)
Doe v. United States
583 A.2d 670 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1990)
Douglas v. District of Columbia
67 F. Supp. 3d 36 (District of Columbia, 2014)
Tenants of 710 Jefferson Street, NW v. District of Columbia Housing Commission and Steven Loney
123 A.3d 170 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2015)
Price v. District of Columbia
61 F. Supp. 3d 135 (District of Columbia, 2014)
In re Goodwin (Bruce E. Gardner)
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2022)
Legislative History
Sept. 3, 1974, 88 Stat. 1091, Pub. L. 93-412, § 2; Jan. 31, 1984, D.C. Law 5-44, § 2, 30 DCR 5411; Aug. 6, 1993, D.C. Law 10-11, § 201, 40 DCR 4007; Sept. 30, 1993, D.C. Law 10-25, § 201, 40 DCR 5489; June 13, 1994, Pub. L. 103-266, § 1(b)(121), 108 Stat. 713; Sept. 26, 1995, D.C. Law 11-52, § 805, 42 DCR 3684; Dec. 21, 2001, 115 Stat. 928, Pub. L. 107-96, par. 20(a)(1), (c); Jan. 10, 2002, 115 Stat. 2307, Pub. L. 107-117, § 404; Oct. 2, 2008, 122 Stat. 3724, Pub. L. 110-335, § 1; Mar. 11, 2009, 123 Stat. 700, Pub. L. 111-8, § 822(a)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 11-101
Judicial power.§ 11-1101
Jurisdiction of the Family Court.§ 11-1104
Administration.§ 11-1106
Reports to Congress.§ 11-1201
Exclusive jurisdiction.§ 11-1202
Abolition of other remedies.§ 11-1203
Rules and regulations.§ 11-1301
Continuation of Branch.§ 11-1302
Sessions.§ 11-1322
Arbitration and conciliation.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
District of Columbia § 11-2604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/dc/11-2604.