District of Columbia Statutes

§ 11-1910 — Challenging compliance with selection procedures.

District of Columbia·Title 11 Organization and Jurisdiction of the Courts. [Enacted title]·Ch. 19 Juries and Jurors.
(a)A party may challenge the composition of a jury by a motion for appropriate relief. A challenge shall be brought and decided before any individual juror is examined, unless the Court orders otherwise. The motion shall be in writing, supported by affidavit, and shall specify the facts constituting the grounds for the challenge. If the Court so determines, the motion may be decided on the basis of the affidavits filed with the challenge. If the Court orders trial of the challenge, witnesses may be examined on oath by the Court and may be so examined by either party.
(b)If the Court determines that in selecting a grand or petit jury there has been a substantial failure to comply with this chapter, the Court shall stay the proceedings pending the selection of a jury in conformity with th

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

District of Columbia § 11-1910 (Challenging compliance with selection procedures.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Epps v. United States
683 A.2d 749 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1996)
13 case citations
Lewis v. Voss
770 A.2d 996 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2001)
7 case citations
Gause v. United States
959 A.2d 671 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2008)
6 case citations
Bethea v. United States
(District of Columbia, 2016)
Brown v. United States
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2025)

Legislative History

Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3635, Pub. L. 99-650, § 2

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗