District of Columbia Statutes

§ 11-1502 — Tenure.

District of Columbia·Title 11 Organization and Jurisdiction of the Courts. [Enacted title]·Ch. 15 Judges of the District of Columbia Courts.·Subch. I Appointment; Qualifications; Service of Judges.
Subject to mandatory retirement at age 74 and to the provisions of subchapters II and III of this chapter, a judge of a District of Columbia court appointed on or after the date of enactment of the District of Columbia Court Reorganization Act of 1970 shall serve for a term of fifteen years, and upon completion of such term, such judge shall continue to serve until the judge’s successor is appointed and qualifies.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

District of Columbia § 11-1502 (Tenure.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Callaham v. United States
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2022)
Copeland v. United States
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2022)
Covington v. United States
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2022)
Crews v. United States
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2021)
Davis v. District of Columbia
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2021)
Davis v. United States
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2023)
Dennis v. Jackson
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2021)
District of Columbia v. Bongam
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2022)
Funderburk v. United States
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2021)
Harris v. United States
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2021)
Hood v. United States
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2022)
In re Adkins
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2021)
In re Amberly
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2021)
In re Chang
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2022)
In re Frank
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2022)
In re Hoffman
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2022)
In re Infurna
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2022)
In re Justo de Pomar
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2022)
In re: Mary Wilson Bruce E. Gardner
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2022)

Legislative History

July 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 491, Pub. L. 91-358, title I, § 111; Mar. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 65, Pub. L. 98-235; June 13, 1994, Pub. L. 103-266, § 1(b)(20), 108 Stat. 713

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗