District of Columbia Statutes
§ 11-1502 — Tenure.
District of Columbia·Title 11 Organization and Jurisdiction of the Courts. [Enacted title]·Ch. 15 Judges of the District of Columbia Courts.·Subch. I Appointment; Qualifications; Service of Judges.
Subject to mandatory retirement at age 74 and to the provisions of subchapters II and III of this chapter, a judge of a District of Columbia court appointed on or after the date of enactment of the District of Columbia Court Reorganization Act of 1970 shall serve for a term of fifteen years, and upon completion of such term, such judge shall continue to serve until the judge’s successor is appointed and qualifies.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
District of Columbia § 11-1502 (Tenure.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barber v. D.C. Commission on Selection and Tenure of Administrative Law Judges
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2021)
Callaham v. United States
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2022)
Copeland v. United States
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2022)
Covington v. United States
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2022)
Crews v. United States
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2021)
Davis v. District of Columbia
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2021)
Davis v. United States
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2023)
Dennis v. Jackson
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2021)
District of Columbia v. Bongam
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2022)
Funderburk v. United States
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2021)
Harris v. United States
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2021)
Hood v. United States
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2022)
In re Adkins
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2021)
In re Amberly
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2021)
In re Chang
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2022)
In re Frank
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2022)
In re Hoffman
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2022)
In re Infurna
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2022)
In re Justo de Pomar
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2022)
In re: Mary Wilson Bruce E. Gardner
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2022)
Legislative History
July 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 491, Pub. L. 91-358, title I, § 111; Mar. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 65, Pub. L. 98-235; June 13, 1994, Pub. L. 103-266, § 1(b)(20), 108 Stat. 713
Nearby Sections
15
§ 11-101
Judicial power.§ 11-1101
Jurisdiction of the Family Court.§ 11-1104
Administration.§ 11-1106
Reports to Congress.§ 11-1201
Exclusive jurisdiction.§ 11-1202
Abolition of other remedies.§ 11-1203
Rules and regulations.§ 11-1301
Continuation of Branch.§ 11-1302
Sessions.§ 11-1322
Arbitration and conciliation.