Connecticut § 8-73 Eviction of families having income over maximum limits. Waiver of eviction requirement.

Connecticut Statutes

§ 8-73 — Eviction of families having income over maximum limits. Waiver of eviction requirement.

Connecticut § 8-73

Title 8Zoning, Planning, Housing and Economic and Community Development

Ch. 128Department of Housing: Municipal Housing Projects

This text of Connecticut § 8-73 (Eviction of families having income over maximum limits. Waiver of eviction requirement.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-73 (2026).

Text

(a)A tenant in a moderate rental housing project shall vacate the dwelling unit occupied by such tenant not later than sixty days after the housing authority or developer has mailed to such tenant, properly addressed, postage prepaid, written notice that the annual income of such tenant's family, determined under section 8-72, is in excess of that permitted for continued occupancy of such dwelling unit under said section. Upon the failure of such tenant to vacate such dwelling unit on or before the expiration of such sixty-day period and as long as such tenant continues to occupy such dwelling unit after the expiration thereof, such tenant shall be obligated, notwithstanding the provisions of section 8-72, to pay to the authority or developer monthly as rent for such dwelling unit an amou

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(a) A tenant in a moderate rental housing project shall vacate the dwelling unit occupied by such tenant not later than sixty days after the housing authority or developer has mailed to such tenant, properly addressed, postage prepaid, written notice that the annual income of such tenant's family, determined under section 8-72, is in excess of that permitted for continued occupancy of such dwelling unit under said section. Upon the failure of such tenant to vacate such dwelling unit on or before the expiration of such sixty-day period and as long as such tenant continues to occupy such dwelling unit after the expiration thereof, such tenant shall be obligated, notwithstanding the provisions of section 8-72, to pay to the authority or developer monthly as rent for such dwelling unit an amount equal to the going rental therefor as fixed by the authority or developer plus an amount equal to two per cent of the excess of the annual income of such family over that permitted for continued occupancy of such dwelling unit under section 8-72. (b) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a) of this section, if the eviction of such tenants would result in or increase the number of vacancies in such project, the housing authority or developer may request approval of the Commissioner of Housing to permit continued occupancy by tenants having an annual income over the maximum limits established for such project and rental of existing vacant units to tenants having an annual income over such maximum limits. If the commissioner finds that the vacancy rate which would result from refusal to grant such approval may result in an inability of the project to provide an income adequate for debt service, if any, administration, including the state service charge, other operating costs and reserves for repairs, maintenance, replacements and collection costs, the commissioner may approve such occupancy for a period of one year, subject to renewal for additional one-year periods. The amount fixed as rent for units so occupied pursuant to this subsection shall be determined as provided in subsection (a) of this section but in no event shall such rent be in excess of one hundred thirty-three per cent of the going rental as established pursuant to section 8-72 .

Legislative History

(1957, P.A. 490; 1967, P.A. 65; P.A. 75-434, S. 1, 2; P.A. 77-614, S. 284, 610; P.A. 78-303, S. 81, 136; 78-304, S. 8, 9, 22; P.A. 79-598, S. 3, 4, 10; P.A. 84-493, S. 6, 9; P.A. 95-250, S. 1; P.A. 96-211, S. 1, 5, 6; P.A. 06-196, S. 45; P.A. 07-217, S. 32; P.A. 13-234, S. 2.) History: 1967 act deleted proviso that 2% surcharge for excess income be not less than $10 a month; P.A. 75-434 added Subsec. (b) re circumstances in which tenants with incomes in excess of maximum allowed to continue in residence on year-to-year basis; P.A. 77-614 substituted department of economic development for commissioner of community affairs, effective January 1, 1979; P.A. 78-303 substituted commissioner for department; P.A. 78-304 included developers under provisions of section and replaced references to Secs. 8-45 and 8-47 with references to Sec. 8-72; P.A. 79-598 substituted commissioner of housing for commissioner of economic development; P.A. 84-493 made technical changes in Subsec. (b); P.A. 95-250 and P.A. 96-211 replaced Commissioner and Department of Housing with Commissioner and Department of Economic and Community Development; P.A. 06-196 made technical changes in Subsec. (a), effective June 7, 2006; P.A. 07-217 made technical changes in Subsec. (b), effective July 12, 2007; pursuant to P.A. 13-234, reference to Commissioner of Economic and Community Development was changed editorially by the Revisors to reference to Commissioner of Housing in Subsec. (b), effective June 19, 2013. Cited. 214 C. 505. Cited. 18 CA 393.