Connecticut Statutes
§ 8-26a — Effect of change in subdivision or zoning regulations or boundaries of districts after approval of plan.
Connecticut § 8-26a
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 8Zoning, Planning, Housing and Economic and Community Development
Ch. 126Municipal Planning Commissions
This text of Connecticut § 8-26a (Effect of change in subdivision or zoning regulations or boundaries of districts after approval of plan.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-26a (2026).
Text
(a)Notwithstanding the provisions of any general or special act or local ordinance, when a change in the subdivision regulations is adopted by the planning commission of any town, city or borough, or other body exercising the powers of such commission, no subdivision plan which has been approved, prior to the effective date of such change, by such planning commission or other body, and filed or recorded with the town clerk, shall be required to conform to such change.
(b)(1) Notwithstanding the provisions of any general or special act or local ordinance, when a change is adopted in the zoning regulations or boundaries of zoning districts of any town, city or borough, no lot or lots shown on a subdivision or resubdivision plan for residential property which has been approved, prior to the
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Poirier v. Z.B.A., Town of Wilton, No. Cv 00 0176661 S (Apr. 23, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 5566 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
Majesky v. Bell, No. Cv 96-0473358s (Dec. 23, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 13261 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Legislative History
(1959, P.A. 58; 59; February, 1965, P.A. 422; 1969, P.A. 396; 1971, P.A. 215; P.A. 84-147, S. 2; P.A. 04-210, S. 1; P.A. 05-288, S. 42; P.A. 24-143, S. 21.) History: 1965 act amended Subsec. (b) to provide buildings to be erected on lots in already approved subdivision shall not be required to conform to changes in zoning regulations; 1969 act replaced in Subsecs. (a) and (b) the deadlines for conforming to changes in regulations, i.e., from “three years ... from approval of subdivision plan” to “five years ... from the effective date of such change”; 1971 act deleted qualifying phrase “for residential property” modifying “subdivision plan”; P.A. 84-147 removed references to a five-year deadline for conformity with changes in subdivision regulations or zoning regulations or boundaries; P.A. 04-210 amended Subsec. (b) by designating existing provisions as Subdiv. (1) and applying said provisions to resubdivisions and by adding new Subdivs. (2) and (3) exempting construction on vacant lots from conformance to zoning changes, requiring construction on improved lots to conform to such changes and specifying that provisions of statute do not alter status of nonconforming uses or structures, effective June 1, 2004; P.A. 05-288 made technical changes in Subsec. (b)(2)(A), effective July 13, 2005; P.A. 24-143 added new Subsec. (b)(2)(B) to exempt certain vacant lots depicted on a recorded subdivision or resubdivision plan from conformance with zoning regulation changes after such recording, added Subsec. (b)(2)(C) to exempt certain vacant lots depicted on a subdivision or resubdivision plan from conformance with zoning regulation changes if such vacant lot was previously in conformance with zoning regulations, and redesignated existing Subsec. (b)(2)(B) as Subsec. (b)(2)(D). Subdivision plan must have been formally approved prior to effective date of change in order to be covered by section. 148 C. 299. Cited. 153 C. 194. Not applicable where plaintiffs had filed maps of subdivisions prior to adoption of regulations where subdivision plan had never been approved. 155 C. 185. Cited. 25 CA 85; 35 CA 820. Subsec. (b): Cited. 36 CA 98. Plaintiff's 1954 subdivision plan that included his lot and was approved, filed and recorded in the town placed lot within the scope of Subsec. and gave plaintiff a vested right; any subsequently enacted regulations are not applicable to plaintiff and do not prevent plaintiff from receiving a zoning permit for subsequent improvements that would otherwise violate subsequently enacted regulations. 75 CA 289. Under Subdiv. (2), lot was not required to comply with subsequent changes because lot was vacant and unimproved when building permit was sought. 118 CA 90.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 8-1
Zoning commissions.§ 8-106
Definitions.§ 8-107
Development of projects.§ 8-110
Federal aid.§ 8-111
Powers to be additional.§ 8-112
Declaration of policy.§ 8-112a
Declaration of policy.§ 8-113a
Definitions.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 8-26a, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/8-26a.