Connecticut Statutes
§ 8-25 — Subdivision of land.
Connecticut § 8-25
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 8Zoning, Planning, Housing and Economic and Community Development
Ch. 126Municipal Planning Commissions
This text of Connecticut § 8-25 (Subdivision of land.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-25 (2026).
Text
(a)No subdivision of land shall be made until a plan for such subdivision has been approved by the commission. Any person, firm or corporation making any subdivision of land without the approval of the commission shall be fined not more than five hundred dollars for each lot sold or offered for sale or so subdivided. Any plan for subdivision shall, upon approval, or when taken as approved by reason of the failure of the commission to act, be filed or recorded by the applicant in the office of the town clerk not later than ninety days after the expiration of the appeal period under section 8-8, or in the case of an appeal, not later than ninety days after the termination of such appeal by dismissal, withdrawal or judgment in favor of the applicant but, if it is a plan for subdivision wholl
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
A. Aiudi & Sons v. Town of Plainville
862 F. Supp. 737 (D. Connecticut, 1994)
Francini v. Town of Farmington
557 F. Supp. 151 (D. Connecticut, 1982)
Canoe Brook Lake v. Zon. Bd. of App., No. Cv96 33 70 37 S (Jan. 28, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 303-SS (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Culbro v. Town of Simsbury, No. Cv960559508 (Mar. 2, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 2861 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Maynard v. Town of Sterling, No. Cv910042707 (Oct. 27, 1994)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 10115 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1994)
Timber Trails Assoc. v. P Z. Comm., No. 32 41 54 (Feb. 18, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 1858 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
Town of Southington v. Comm. Union Ins., No. Cv-95-565691 (Jan. 22, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 376 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
Town of Haddam v. Axa Global Risks, No. X03 Cv 99 0497638s (Mar. 15, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 3721 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
Canoe Brook Lake Assn. v. Zba, No. Cv 96337037s (Jan. 28, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 624-D (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Legislative History
(1949 Rev., S. 858; November, 1955, S. N12; 1959, P.A. 577, S. 7; 669; 1971, P.A. 196; 862, S. 8; P.A. 75-131; P.A. 77-545, S. 2; P.A. 78-104, S. 5; 78-314, S. 4; P.A. 79-301; P.A. 81-254; 81-334, S. 1; P.A. 83-388, S. 8, 9; P.A. 85-91, S. 4, 5; P.A. 88-203, S. 2; 88-263; P.A. 90-239, S. 1; P.A. 91-395, S. 4, 11; P.A. 93-29; P.A. 95-335, S. 15, 26; P.A. 99-131; P.A. 01-52; P.A. 03-177, S. 6; P.A. 07-182, S. 1; P.A. 11-79, S. 2; P.A. 12-182, S. 2.) History: 1959 acts added provision for filing of subdivision plans in case of a district and added provision regulations authorize commission to provide open spaces for parks and playgrounds; 1971 acts added provisions concerning extensions for filing subdivision plans, specified that applicant must do filing and that endorsement of approval must be made by chairman or secretary and changed notice requirement from publication at least seven days before hearing to publication “twice, at intervals of not less than two days, the first not more than fifteen days nor less than ten days and the last not less than two days” before hearing; P.A. 75-131 required that plans be delivered to applicant promptly for filing purposes after appeal deadline passed or after appeal terminated; P.A. 77-545 added provision that regulations made govern sedimentation and erosion control; P.A. 78-104 included “maintenance” of improvements and utilities in bond provision; P.A. 78-314 allowed encouragement of energy-efficient development, use of renewable forms of energy and energy conservation through regulations; P.A. 79-301 increased fine for making unapproved subdivision from $200 to $500; P.A. 81-254 allowed for conditional approval of plans; P.A. 81-334 moved provisions re regulations to encourage energy-efficient patterns of development, use of solar and other renewable forms of energy and energy conservation into new Subsec. (b) and outlined content of regulations; P.A. 83-388 amended Subsec. (a) to require that provision be made for soil erosion and sediment control, effective July 1, 1985; P.A. 85-91 amended Subsec. (a) to specify the date by which time provision for soil erosion and sediment control is required; P.A. 88-203 added provisions in Subsec. (a) re imposition of conditions and requirements on certain manufactured homes and developments to be occupied by certain manufactured homes; P.A. 88-263 substituted “shall” for “may” in Subsec. (b) to require that subdivision regulations encourage energy-efficient patterns of development and land use, the use of solar and other renewable forms of energy and energy conservation; P.A. 90-239 amended Subsec. (a) to allow the payment of a fee in lieu of the provision of open spaces and to exempt transfers of land to certain relatives from the open spaces requirements; P.A. 91-395 added Subsec. (c) concerning authorization for cluster development in regulations adopted under this section; P.A. 93-29 amended Subsec. (a) to change the time planning commissions have to deliver approved plans to subdivision applicants from “promptly” after the expiration of an appeal or termination in the applicant's favor to 30 days after either event and to change the date for filing of approved plans by a developer from 90 days after the time for appeal to 90 days after termination in the applicant's favor; P.A. 95-335 amended Subsec. (a) to change “plan of development” to “plan of conservation and development”, effective July 1, 1995; P.A. 99-131 amended Subsec. (a) by requiring regulations covering the subdivision of land to include a provision for the “upgrading of any downstream ditch, culvert or other drainage structure which, through the introduction of additional drainage due to such subdivision, becomes undersized and creates the potential for flooding on a state highway”; P.A. 01-52 amended Subsec. (a) to change the time for delivery of approved subdivision plans from not less than 30 days to not more than 30 days and add provisions re modified plans and amended Subsec. (b) to make a technical change for purposes of gender neutrality; P.A. 03-177 replaced provisions in Subsec. (a) re publication of notice of time, place and purpose of public hearing with requirement that the public hearing be held in accordance with Sec. 8-7d, effective October 1, 2003, and applicable to applications filed on or after that date; P.A. 07-182 amended Subsec. (a) to allow a person who enters into a contract to purchase a subdivided lot pursuant to conditional approval to rescind such contract if such final approval has additional amendments or any conditions not included in the conditional approval that are unacceptable to the buyer, to provide that a fine of $1,000 be imposed on any person who, before final approval, transfers title to any lot subdivided pursuant to conditional approval for each lot transferred, deleting prior fine of $500 imposed on any person who sells or offers for sale any such lot, to require that nothing in subsection be construed to authorize the marketing of any lot before granting or renewal of conditional approval, and to make technical changes, effective July 1, 2007; P.A. 11-79 amended Subsec. (a) by adding “or other surety” re conditional approval and adding “public” re improvements secured by bond, and added Subsec. (d) re bond and surety requirements and release of same; P.A. 12-182 made extensive changes in Subsecs. (a) and (d) re posting and release of financial guarantees and re public improvements, effective June 15, 2012, and applicable to all approvals or extensions granted after that date. If plan complies with subdivision regulations, commission lacks authority to disapprove it. 146 C. 570. Cited. 148 C. 145, 299. Planning commission approves, disapproves, or modifies and approves, plans for claimed subdivisions; it is not part of its function to decide whether particular property is a subdivision; court should not dismiss complaint for declaratory judgment as to whether certain premises is a subdivision on ground that issue should first be decided by planning commission. 149 C. 627. Cited. 152 C. 304; Id., 520. Adoption of a “plan of development” pursuant to Sec. 8-23 is not a condition precedent to the enactment of valid subdivision regulations. 153 C. 193. Section held not to authorize town to adopt a subdivision regulation imposing a charge against a real estate developer as a condition for granting permission to proceed with an approved subdivision plan when such charge was purportedly to cover reasonable costs incurred by the town for engineering services to inspect work done on public improvements in the subdivision. Id., 236. Mere filing of subdivision maps does not necessarily immunize subject property from operative effect of subsequent subdivision regulations. 155 C. 183. Subdivision regulations construed as a whole, being within the purview of section and reasonably adequate and sufficient to guide commission and enable those affected to know their rights and obligations and precise to degree required by subject matter, held valid. Id., 669. Regulations of town which has adopted chapter must conform to requirements of section. 156 C. 540. Only action on subdivision plan and designation of and assessments for municipal improvements are binding actions of planning board. 159 C. 1. This section and Sec. 13a-71 may not be circumvented by claims of common law dedication. Id., 107. Authority granted under statute is not unpermitted exercise of police power where activity is directly attributable to subdivision activity; it does not amount to unconstitutional taking of private land for public use without compensation; held not unconstitutional for vagueness or lack of standards to implement it; constitutional validity established because all property is held subject to right of state to reasonably regulate use. 160 C. 109. Cited. 171 C. 89; 172 C. 156; 176 C. 581; 177 C. 527; 179 C. 650; 181 C. 533; 184 C. 1; 186 C. 466; 187 C. 232; 199 C. 575; 203 C. 109; 207 C. 67; 208 C. 431; 213 C. 604; 217 C. 103; 226 C. 684; 227 C. 71, 83; 228 C. 476. Sale of lots in approved subdivision not required for municipality to call performance bond. 254 C. 348. Cited. 5 CA 520; 8 CA 556; 12 CA 153; 16 CA 303; 19 CA 334; 23 CA 115; Id., 460; 26 CA 17; 28 CA 780; 29 CA 18; Id., 28; 31 CA 643; 37 CA 303; 40 CA 75; 49 CA 452. Fact that a performance bond was provided pursuant to statute that protects municipalities from being left with inadequate resources to complete subdivision improvements, coupled with unambiguous language of the bond, clearly supports conclusion that the bond was available to plaintiff to complete the subdivision even though plaintiff had become a successor developer. 71 CA 715. Planning commission cannot enact subdivision regulation that effectively amends or alters a zoning ordinance because commission would be exceeding its statutory mandate. 76 CA 280. Plaintiff's case for declaratory judgment on constitutionality of a subdivision regulation was ripe for judicial consideration because it concerned his rights as a property owner and events that plaintiff was likely to confront. 85 CA 606. Held constitutional exercise of power and land requirement in city regulations for subdivision plan within legislative authority, but provision for cash contribution in lieu of land requirement unconstitutional where moneys are not collected for direct benefit of subdivision. 27 CS 74. Cited. 31 CS 83; 43 CS 508. Subsec. (a): Commission's authority is limited to the “land to be subdivided” and commission lacks authority to require applicant to include off-site sidewalk installations in subdivision application. 292 C. 317. When there has been an appeal from subdivision approval, such subdivision becomes effective on date such appeal from approval is terminated. 297 C. 414. Section neither prohibits the mortgaging of a parcel in an unapproved subdivision nor prevents the court from ordering a foreclosure of any such parcel. 324 C. 680. Provision that subdivided land be of such character that it can be used for building purposes without danger to health or public authority does not authorize regulations to provide that proposed streets connect with existing roads within town in which the subdivision is located. 97 CA 316.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 8-1
Zoning commissions.§ 8-106
Definitions.§ 8-107
Development of projects.§ 8-110
Federal aid.§ 8-111
Powers to be additional.§ 8-112
Declaration of policy.§ 8-112a
Declaration of policy.§ 8-113a
Definitions.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 8-25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/8-25.