Connecticut Statutes
§ 7-474 — Negotiations and agreements between municipality and employee representatives. Federal approval. Elective binding arbitration; procedure; apportionment of costs.
Connecticut § 7-474
This text of Connecticut § 7-474 (Negotiations and agreements between municipality and employee representatives. Federal approval. Elective binding arbitration; procedure; apportionment of costs.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-474 (2026).
Text
(a)Except as hereinafter provided, when an employee organization has been designated, in accordance with the provisions of sections 7-467 to 7-477, inclusive, as the exclusive representative of employees in an appropriate unit, the chief executive officer, whether elected or appointed, or his designated representative or representatives, shall represent the municipal employer in collective bargaining with such employee organization.
(b)Any agreement reached by the negotiators shall be reduced to writing. Except where the legislative body is the town meeting, a request for funds necessary to implement such written agreement and for approval of any provisions of the agreement which are in conflict with any charter, special act, ordinance, rule or regulation adopted by the municipal employe
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bridgeport Firebird Society v. City of Bridgeport
686 F. Supp. 53 (D. Connecticut, 1988)
Kearney v. City of Bridgeport Police Department
573 F. Supp. 2d 562 (D. Connecticut, 2008)
Baldyga v. City of New Britain
554 F. Supp. 2d 268 (D. Connecticut, 2008)
City of Groton v. Board of Labor Rel., No. Cv 94 010 47 42 (Mar. 12, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 3420 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Scandura v. Middletown, No. Cv 01 0094798s (Feb. 27, 2003)
2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 2801 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2003)
Murchison v. Civil Service Commission, No. 111469 (May 3, 1994)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 4774 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1994)
Legislative History
(February, 1965, P.A. 159, S. 8; 1967, P.A. 491, S. 6–10; 708; 1969, P.A. 174; 1971, P.A. 532, S. 1, 2; P.A. 75-35; 75-173, S. 2; 75-570, S. 4, 6; P.A. 82-212, S. 1; P.A. 85-18, S. 2; 85-31, S. 2; P.A. 87-100, S. 2; P.A. 90-47, S. 2; P.A. 92-170, S. 19, 20, 26.) History: 1967 acts amended Subsec. (b) by adding provision re conflict between agreement and any general statute concerning covering or removing coverage under municipal employees retirement system, by requiring submission of request for funds or approval of conflicting provisions be made within 14 days of reaching agreement and by establishing failure to make submission within specified time as prohibited practice and setting forth terms re approval or rejection, amended Subsec. (d) by declaring binding nature of agreements made by districts, school boards, etc., amended Subsec. (e) by allowing bargaining to continue after budget deadline and by allowing retroactive effective dates for terms of agreement and amended Subsec. (f) to include conflicts with statutes concerning municipal employees retirement system and further amended Subsec. (b) to provide for cases where legislative body is town meeting; 1969 act amended Subsec. (f) to clarify effective date of provisions in agreements which affect participation of employees in municipal employees' retirement system; 1971 act amended Subsecs. (b) and (f) by adding provision re conflict between agreement and coverage or noncoverage under policemen and firemen survivors' benefit fund; P.A. 75-35 added to Subsec. (d) provision re agreement terms which require federal approval; P.A. 75-173 and 75-570 amended Subsec. (c) to include agreements approved as result of arbitration decision or as result of failure to reject fact finder's report; P.A. 75-570 also added Subsecs. (h) to (k) re arbitration proceedings after rejection of fact finder's report; P.A. 82-212 added proviso in Subsec. (g) specifying types of proposed changes to promotional process which shall be subject to collective bargaining and declared “initial” appointments and content of promotional examinations to be not subject to collective bargaining; P.A. 85-18 amended Subsec. (j)(2) to establish a more specific and extensive list of factors to be considered by the arbitration panel, including prior negotiations, public interest, employee interests, cost of living changes, existing conditions of employment of the employee group and prevailing conditions in the labor market; P.A. 85-31 amended Subsec. (j) to require each panel member to state the reasons and standards used in making his arbitration decision; P.A. 87-100 added Subsec. (l) which limited the presentation of new issues to binding arbitration; P.A. 90-47 amended Subsec. (d) to include nonprofit fire-fighting corporations as representatives for collective bargaining; P.A. 92-170 amended Subsec. (c) to remove references to fact-finding and removed Subsecs. (h) to (l), inclusive, concerning fact-finding, effective May 26, 1992, and applicable to arbitration proceedings commencing on or after that date (Revisor's note: An obsolete reference in Subsec. (c) to “or subsections (h) to (k), inclusive, of this section” was deleted editorially by the Revisors). Cited. 171 C. 347; Id., 553; 175 C. 349. Standing to test constitutionality of binding arbitration provisions of Municipal Employees Relations Act discussed. 181 C. 421. Cited. 185 C. 88; 196 C. 192; Id., 623; 200 C. 38; 201 C. 577; Id., 685; 204 C. 746; 205 C. 116; 210 C. 549; 212 C. 294; 215 C. 14; 217 C. 490; 221 C. 244; 225 C. 297; 234 C. 51; Id., 123; 239 C. 32. Cited. 3 CA 1; 16 CA 232. Cited. 28 CS 267. Subsecs. (f) and (g) not in conflict, since merit examination appointments not subject to collective bargaining agreements. 30 CS 259. A public announcement of plaintiff's intention to file a prohibited practice complaint against a union is protected by the Municipal Employees Relations Act when the complaint is actually filed at a later date. 31 CS 7. Subsecs. (f) and (g) provide that the provisions of a municipal charter concerning political activity shall override the substantive and procedural provisions of any collective bargaining agreement on that subject. 35 CS 645. Cited. 42 CS 227; 43 CS 470. Subsecs. (b) and (d) conflict because (b) requires submission of contract term requiring fiscal appropriation to municipal legislative body while (d) does not; the specific authority applicable to housing authorities in (d) prevails over the more general authority contained in (b). 47 CS 624. Subsec. (d): Right of a board under statute to act as exclusive negotiator in bargaining collectively with its employees is not impaired by subsequent subsections of this section. 182 C. 93. Subsec. (f): Subsec. determines the effect of a validly negotiated agreement and does not purport to prescribe the conditions of valid negotiation. 182 C. 93. Cited. 206 C. 563. An agreement made in a matter not appropriate for collective bargaining does not prevail over conflicting civil service rules and court's orders implementing such rules. 284 C. 237. Cited. 31 CS 125; 36 CS 637. Subsec. (g): Subsec. does not address other sources of limitation on powers of local civil service commissions. 182 C. 93. Cited. 206 C. 643. Collective bargaining is limited to changes in the promotional examination process; decision on application of preexisting qualifications is not subject to collective bargaining. 234 C. 35. In the absence of proposed change in promotional examination process, grievance settlement resulting in promotion may not be considered part of promotional examination process. 284 C. 237. Cited. 7 CA 105; 11 CA 37; 22 CA 402; 32 CA 280; Id., 289. Only three enumerated adjustments to municipal policy governing merit examinations must first be subject to collective bargaining; because a written examination was not mandated, its elimination did not constitute a change in the “relative weight” of examination methods. 210 CA 529. Appeal from dismissal of municipal employees for political activities proscribed by city charter properly brought to public employees appeal board; statute excludes such charter provisions from collective bargaining; dismissal cannot be construed as a grievance required to be subject to binding arbitration as prescribed in the collective bargaining agreement. 35 CS 645. Cited. 39 CS 1.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 7-10
Oath.§ 7-101
Town seal.§ 7-102
Signposts.§ 7-105a
Office of grand juror abolished.§ 7-106
Oath of grand jurors.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 7-474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/7-474.