Connecticut Statutes

§ 7-471 — Powers of State Board of Labor Relations.

Connecticut § 7-471
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 7Municipalities
Ch. 113Municipal Employees

This text of Connecticut § 7-471 (Powers of State Board of Labor Relations.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-471 (2026).

Text

The State Board of Labor Relations shall have the following power and authority in relation to collective bargaining in municipal employment:

(1)Whenever, in accordance with such regulations as may be prescribed by the board, a petition has been filed (A) by an employee or group of employees or any employee organization acting in their behalf alleging that a substantial number of employees (i) wish to be represented for collective bargaining by an employee organization as exclusive representative, or (ii) assert that the employee organization which has been certified or is currently being recognized by their municipal employer as the bargaining representative is no longer the representative of a majority of employees in the unit;
(B)by a municipal employer alleging that one or more emplo

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matejek v. Afscme, No. Cv00 0071059s (Mar. 29, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 4496 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)

Legislative History

(February, 1965, P.A. 159, S. 5; 1967, P.A. 491, S. 3, 4; P.A. 78-375, S. 2; P.A. 79-313; P.A. 81-29, S. 3; P.A. 91-255, S. 2; P.A. 92-170, S. 16, 26; P.A. 07-217, S. 28.) History: 1967 act amended Subdiv. (2) to require that at least two of the criteria enumerating characteristics of supervisory positions apply in determining exclusion from coverage and amended Subdiv. (3) to clarify that “single unit” refers to fire department and police department units rather than to uniformed and investigatory units within each and to set forth conditions in which professional and nonprofessional employees may be in same unit; P.A. 78-375 deleted reference to “supervisory” positions in Subdiv. (2) and amended Subdiv. (3) to prohibit units from including both supervisory and nonsupervisory employees except in police and fire departments and to exempt existing units from conformity with provision re supervisory and nonsupervisory employees; P.A. 79-313 added Subdiv. (4)(E) re cease and desist orders; P.A. 81-29 transferred certain powers of board to its agent re petitions concerning the election of representatives but rested final action with the board; P.A. 91-255 added Subdiv. (1)(C) re petitions filed by employee organizations or municipal employers, added new Subdiv. (4) re petitions seeking clarification or modification of existing units and redesignated existing Subdiv. (4) as Subdiv. (5); P.A. 92-170 amended Subdiv. (5) to replace references to fact finding with arbitration, effective May 26, 1992, and applicable to arbitration proceedings commencing on or after that date; P.A. 07-217 made technical changes in Subdivs. (3) and (4), effective July 12, 2007. There is no direct appeal from decision of board determining a bargaining unit and directing an election; National Labor Relations Act compared. 154 C. 530. Appeals to Supreme Court under section shall be taken and prosecuted in same manner as other appeals to Supreme Court. 159 C. 46. Cited. 171 C. 347, 351; Id., 553, 564. One employee does not constitute an appropriate bargaining unit for purposes of the Municipal Employees Relations Act. 175 C. 349. Standing to test constitutionality of binding arbitration provisions of Municipal Employees Relations Act discussed. 181 C. 421. Cited. 182 C. 93; 185 C. 88; 196 C. 192; 200 C. 38; 201 C. 577; 204 C. 746; 205 C. 116; 210 C. 549; 212 C. 294; 215 C. 14; 221 C. 244; 225 C. 297; 232 C. 57; 234 C. 123. Cited. 3 CA 1; 16 CA 232. It is within board's discretion to award costs and expenses to the employer. 49 CA 513. A public announcement of plaintiff's intention to file a prohibited practice complaint against a union is protected by the Municipal Employees Relations Act when the complaint is actually filed at a later date. 31 CS 7. Cited. Id., 15; Id., 212; 36 CS 18; 42 CS 227; 43 CS 340; Id., 470. Subdiv. (1): Sec. 1-1(f) is directory not mandatory, does not “require” singular and plural forms to be interchangeable and therefore where statute sets forth “a substantial number of employees”, “employees” cannot be construed as singular. 175 C. 349. One year rule does not apply to designations by employer recognition agreements; union's status must be recognized for a reasonable period. 39 CS 338. Subdiv. (3): There can be no community of interest where there is only a single employee. 175 C. 349. Subdiv. (5) (Former Subdiv. (4)): Cited. 171 C. 344, 355; 210 C. 597. Although Subdiv. contains no express requirement that all administrative remedies be exhausted, the legislative history makes clear that employees may only appeal to the Superior Court after an adverse final order of the Board of Labor Relations. 300 C. 667. Cited. 33 CA 541. Cited. 39 CS 338; 40 CS 365.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 7-471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/7-471.