Connecticut Statutes
§ 54-47d — Appointment of investigatory grand jury. Duration and scope of investigation.
Connecticut § 54-47d
This text of Connecticut § 54-47d (Appointment of investigatory grand jury. Duration and scope of investigation.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 54-47d (2026).
Text
(a)If the panel approves the application and orders an investigation into the commission of a crime or crimes, the Chief Court Administrator shall (1) appoint an investigatory grand jury to conduct the investigation, and (2) designate the court location in the judicial district where any motions to quash and any contempt proceedings shall be heard and any findings and records of the investigation shall be filed.
(b)Each order authorizing the investigation into the commission of a crime or crimes by the panel shall specify:
(1)The date of issuance of the order, (2) the period of time within which the investigation is to be conducted, provided in no event shall the investigation be longer than six months from the date the Chief Court Administrator appoints the investigatory grand jury to
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Legislative History
(P.A. 85-611, S. 3; P.A. 87-350, S. 3, 6; P.A. 98-48, S. 3; P.A. 03-273, S. 2.) History: P.A. 87-350 made technical changes in Subsec. (a) and deleted provision in Subsec. (c) requiring extension or amendment to contain the findings thus far made; P.A. 98-48 amended Subsec. (b)(4) to insert Subpara. indicators and add Subpara. (B) re the panel's reasons for finding that other normal investigative procedures have failed or are unlikely to succeed if tried or be too dangerous to employ and Subpara. (C) re the panel's reasons for finding that the investigative procedures employed by the investigatory grand jury appear likely to succeed in determining whether or not there is probable cause to believe that a crime or crimes have been committed; P.A. 03-273 made a technical change in Subsec. (a) and amended Subsec. (b)(4)(B) to add provision re finding that due to the specific nature of the alleged crime or the nature of the investigation, it is reasonable to conclude that the use of normal investigative procedures would not result in the obtaining of information that would advance the investigation or would fail to secure and preserve evidence or testimony that might otherwise be compromised. Cited. 202 C. 541; 204 C. 259; 206 C. 203; 207 C. 98; 213 C. 66; 221 C. 625. Cited. 16 CA 679; 17 CA 395; 20 CA 447. An application and order transmitted by an investigatory grand jury panel pursuant to Subsec. (b) are part of the record of the investigatory grand jury. 104 CA 398; judgment reversed, see 293 C. 247. Cited. 45 CS 1.
Nearby Sections
15
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 54-47d, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/54-47d.