Connecticut Statutes

§ 54-36a — Definitions. Inventory. Return of stolen property. Disposition of other seized property. Return of compliance.

Connecticut § 54-36a
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 54Criminal Procedure
Ch. 959Court Jurisdiction and Power

This text of Connecticut § 54-36a (Definitions. Inventory. Return of stolen property. Disposition of other seized property. Return of compliance.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 54-36a (2026).

Text

(a)As used in this section, sections 53-278c and 54-36c:
(1)“Contraband” means any property, the possession of which is prohibited by any provision of the general statutes;
(2)“stolen property” shall include, but not be limited to, cash or the proceeds from the sale of such property obtained by theft or other illegal means;
(3)“owner” means a person or persons entitled to seized property as a matter of law or fact.
(b)(1) Whenever property is seized in connection with a criminal arrest or seized pursuant to a search warrant without an arrest, the law enforcement agency seizing such property shall file, on forms provided for this purpose by the Office of the Chief Court Administrator, an inventory of the property seized. The inventory, together with the uniform arrest report, in the ca

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schiff v. Kerrigan
625 F. Supp. 704 (D. Connecticut, 1986)
9 case citations
Malapanis v. Regan
335 F. Supp. 2d 285 (D. Connecticut, 2004)
5 case citations
Housing Authority of Stamford v. Dawkins, No. Spno-9502-16173 (May 10, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 5027 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
1 case citations
State v. Pensiero, No. Cr99-112144 (Dec. 8, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 15418 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)

Legislative History

(P.A. 74-221, S. 1–6; P.A. 75-530, S. 16, 17, 35; P.A. 76-77, S. 1; P.A. 78-280, S. 1, 127; P.A. 79-392; P.A. 81-240, S. 1, 3; P.A. 82-235; P.A. 85-263, S. 1; P.A. 87-243; 87-294, S. 2; P.A. 99-247, S. 5; P.A. 01-104; 01-186, S. 8; June 30 Sp. Sess. P.A. 03-6, S. 146(c); P.A. 04-189, S. 1; P.A. 07-246, S. 5; P.A. 12-72, S. 1; P.A. 23-79, S. 51.) History: P.A. 75-530 amended Subsec. (b) to make clear distinctions between filing procedure for inventories of property seized in arrest or under a search warrant, and to add provisions specifically applicable to stolen property and restated Subsec. (c); P.A. 76-77 required that uniform arrest report or search warrant, as the case may be, be filed with inventory, added exception to inventory requirement in connection with arrest re stolen property not exceeding $50 in value and added provision re return of stolen property upon its owner's application to court in Subsec. (b) and changed applicable time periods re claims for property and return of property in Subsecs. (c) to (f) from one year to six months; P.A. 78-280 deleted references to filing of inventories in counties; P.A. 79-392 added definitions of “stolen property” and “owner” in Subsec. (a) and substituted reference to Sec. 54-36c for reference to Sec. 54-36b; P.A. 81-240 replaced previous provisions re return of stolen property with new provisions re notification of the owner of stolen property, procedure for return of stolen property within 30 days of request therefor, except for good cause shown and specified that secondary nature of evidence may affect weight of evidence but not admissibility in Subsec. (b) and deleted provision in Subsec. (e) whereby return of compliance was filed after return of property to owner or at the end of six months in cases where court orders return within that time period; P.A. 82-235 required office of chief court administrator to provide forms for return of stolen property, required notice of stolen property within 10 days instead of 48 hours, provided procedure for return of seized property, other than stolen property or contraband, within six months, eliminated sentence of imprisonment for criminal contempt for failure to file the return of compliance and required that any sale of unclaimed seized property ordered by the court shall be public; P.A. 85-263 amended Subsec. (b) by adding exceptions of stolen property which does not exceed $250 in value or when an attempt was made to steal property but property remained on premises in sealed container, amended Subsec. (c) by adding “finds that such property is a controlled drug” and “drug paraphernalia”, and added provisions re order of return of property by court, property adjudicated a nuisance, disposition of controlled drugs, controlled substances and drug paraphernalia and immediate filing of return of compliance if owner fails to claim property within six months; P.A. 87-243 added new Subsec. (f) re the forfeiture and destruction of fireworks and the admissibility of secondary evidence of such fireworks, and relettered the remaining subsections and internal references accordingly; P.A. 87-294 specified that property which is money and sale or auction proceeds be deposited in the general fund; P.A. 99-247 amended Subsec. (b) to insert Subdiv. indicators, reposition provision re transfer of inventory and add new Subdiv. (3) re the deposit of seized currency in a safe deposit box in a financial institution, the removal of such currency and the responsibility of such financial institution with respect to such safe deposit box and its contents; P.A. 01-104 amended Subsec. (b) by making a technical change for purposes of gender neutrality and adding provisions re motor vehicles in Subdiv. (2), deleting former Subdiv. (3) and adding new Subdiv. (3) re currency; P.A. 01-186 amended Subsec. (i) by requiring return of compliance to be filed within 72 hours of return of property or court order, providing that failure to comply with court order within 90 days shall constitute criminal contempt, adding provision re each failure to file return of compliance within required period shall constitute a separate criminal contempt and making conforming changes; June 30 Sp. Sess. P.A. 03-6 replaced Commissioner of Consumer Protection with Commissioner of Agriculture and Consumer Protection, effective July 1, 2004; P.A. 04-189 repealed Sec. 146 of June 30 Sp. Sess. P.A. 03-6, thereby reversing the merger of the Departments of Agriculture and Consumer Protection, effective June 1, 2004; P.A. 07-246 amended Subsec. (f) to provide that a photograph and affidavit shall be sufficient evidence of the identity of fireworks; P.A. 12-72 amended Subsec. (b)(1) to increase from $250 to $1,000 the maximum value of stolen property re when police may return the property to the owner without filing an inventory; P.A. 23-79 made technical and conforming changes in Subsecs. (c) to (e) and (g), effective July 1, 2023. Cited. 181 C. 388; 192 C. 98; 204 C. 259; 242 C. 666. Cited. 5 CA 540; 10 CA 130; 23 CA 215; 30 CA 249; 33 CA 409. Denial of request for return of seized property pursuant to statute was appealable and plaintiff improperly brought a writ of error. 107 CA 760. Statute does not apply to money found near drugs and seized at the same time as an arrest for violations of drug laws. 108 CA 533. Cited. 35 CS 659; 36 CS 352; 39 CS 392. Subsec. (a): The mere possibility of civil judgment concluding that defendant holds legal lien or security interest in property at issue was insufficient to establish defendant as the owner of such property for purposes of Subsec. 154 CA 405. Subsec. (b): Where stolen jewelry was inadvertently returned to owner without notifying defendant, admission of secondary evidence not improper where defendant had opportunity to cross-examine and challenge value of stolen property claimed by state. 133 CA 681. Subsec. (c): Statute authorizes the forfeiture in this case, prior to enactment of the 1984 amendment to Sec. 54-33g, which incorporated seizure as a result of a warrantless arrest. 196 C. 471. So long as a nexus exists between the seized and the crimes charged, it is irrelevant whether the property is contraband. 177 CA 129. Use of radar detection device not “crime” so as to warrant forfeiture of device. 36 CS 551.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 54-36a, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/54-36a.