Connecticut Statutes
§ 51-88 — Practice of law by persons not admitted as attorneys. Exceptions.
Connecticut § 51-88
This text of Connecticut § 51-88 (Practice of law by persons not admitted as attorneys. Exceptions.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 51-88 (2026).
Text
(a)Unless a person is providing legal services pursuant to statute or rule of the Superior Court, a person who has not been admitted as an attorney under the provisions of section 51-80 or, having been admitted under section 51-80, has been disqualified from the practice of law due to resignation, disbarment, being placed on inactive status or suspension, shall not:
(1)Practice law or appear as an attorney-at-law for another in any court of record in this state, (2) make it a business to practice law or appear as an attorney-at-law for another in any such court, (3) make it a business to solicit employment for an attorney-at-law, (4) hold himself or herself out to the public as being entitled to practice law, (5) assume to be an attorney-at-law, (6) assume, use or advertise the title of
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pappas v. Philip Morris, Inc.
915 F.3d 889 (Second Circuit, 2019)
In Re Peterson
163 B.R. 665 (D. Connecticut, 1994)
Monroe v. Horwitch
820 F. Supp. 682 (D. Connecticut, 1993)
Orsini v. Interiors of Yesterday, LLC (In Re Interiors of Yesterday, LLC)
284 B.R. 19 (D. Connecticut, 2002)
Windover v. Sprague Technologies
834 F. Supp. 560 (D. Connecticut, 1993)
Traylor v. Awwa
899 F. Supp. 2d 216 (D. Connecticut, 2012)
Valiant Insurance Co. v. Nurse Network, No. Cv980578083 (Sep. 25, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 11176 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
Statewide Grievance Committee v. Recio, No. Cv02-0077949s (Jul. 8, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 9481 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
Statewide Grievance v. Srubar, No. 00 0179323s (Dec. 20, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 15809 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Statewide Grievance Comm. v. Goldstein, No. Cv96-0558603 S (Dec. 26, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 7087 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)
Villano v. Miller
(D. Connecticut, 2019)
Kaufman LLC v. Estate of Herbert Feinberg
(D. Connecticut, 2024)
Legislative History
(1949 Rev., S. 7638, 7641; P.A. 82-248, S. 74; P.A. 91-324, S. 3; P.A. 95-137; P.A. 04-2, S. 1; P.A. 12-80, S. 116; P.A. 13-29, S. 1.) History: P.A. 82-248 made technical revision, rewording some provisions and dividing section into Subsecs. but made no substantive change; P.A. 91-324 amended Subsec. (d) to provide that the documents are filed in the town clerk's office in the town in which the town clerk “holds office” rather than the town in which he “resides” and to add Subdiv. (3) re a person acting as an agent or representative for a party in an international arbitration; P.A. 95-137 amended Subsec. (b) to add provision making the criminal penalties inapplicable to certain employees of business entities who render legal advice to their employers and to define “employee”; P.A. 04-2 made a technical change in Subsec. (d)(3) and added Subsec. (d)(4) re an attorney admitted to practice law in any other state or the District of Columbia practicing law in relation to impeachment proceeding, effective March 11, 2004, and applicable to any practice of law on or after January 26, 2004; P.A. 12-80 amended Subsec. (b) to change penalty from a fine of not more than $250 or imprisonment of not more than 2 months or both to a class C misdemeanor; P.A. 13-29 amended Subsec. (a) to add provision re person providing legal services pursuant to statute or rule of Superior Court, add provision re person previously admitted under Sec. 51-80 who has been disqualified due to resignation, disbarment, inactive status or suspension, and add Subdiv. (8) re otherwise engaging in the practice of law as defined by statute or rule of Superior Court, amended Subsec. (b) to insert Subdiv. (1) and (2) designators, increase penalty to class D felony, retain existing class C misdemeanor penalty for defendant who committed act while admitted to practice and in good standing in other jurisdiction, add provision re person whose admission is suspended solely for failure to pay occupational tax or client security fund fee not to be subject to prosecution under section, add provision re rendering legal advice to employer or affiliate when admitted in a foreign jurisdiction as permitted by rule of Superior Court, and add Subdiv. (3) re state's burden of proof in prosecution under Secs. 53a-8 and 53a-48, and made technical changes. Giving of certificates as to validity of land titles is practice of law. 128 C. 325. To “practice law” means to perform either in or out of court any acts commonly understood to be the practice of law; history of section reviewed. 145 C. 222. Practice of law by trust departments of banks; appearances at Probate Court hearings constitute the practice of law. 146 C. 556. History discussed. 154 C. 129, 137–140. Section forbids one who has not passed the bar from practicing law in or out of court. Id., 140. Defendant was not giving “general information” but, rather, information directed toward a particular person and to a particular instrument; consequently he was practicing law. Id., 144. While it may be difficult to define “practice of law” and those who engage in border area activity might claim it is unconstitutionally ambiguous as to them, defendant could not so claim because his activity was well within area of “practice of law”. Id., 148. Statute not unconstitutionally void for vagueness or overly broad so as to infringe on first amendment rights. 239 C. 251. Cited. Id., 256. Cited. 14 CA 172; 29 CA 43; 34 CA 543; 37 CA 529; 44 CA 381. There is no right of self-representation under Subsec. (d)(2) for an executor bringing an action pursuant to Sec. 52-555, as that section allows a cause of action maintainable by an executor or administrator in his representative, fiduciary capacity, not as an individual plaintiff. 118 CA 211. Trustee, as a nonlawyer, does not have authority to appear pro se for purposes of maintaining an appeal on behalf of trust. 119 CA 785. Individual, who is not a party to the case or an attorney, does not have authority to represent defendant trust in appeal of foreclosure action. 223 CA 739. Drafting of wills is practice of law. 4 CS 438. Cited. 9 CS 94. Town clerks are not allowed to render opinions with respect to validity of real estate titles. Id., 253. Cited. 20 CS 256; Id., 268. Terms of injunction in accordance with Supreme Court decision re practice of law by trust departments of banks. 21 CS 42. New York attorney not a member of Connecticut bar held not entitled to recover for legal services rendered in Connecticut. 23 CS 225. Cited. 34 CS 674. Whether pro se status alone suffices to strike class action allegations is not clear. 37 CS 46. Cited. 40 CS 361. Not error to deny motion for new trial even if witness' testimony was false but it appears that result reached on new trial would not be different. 2 Conn. Cir. Ct. 257. Improper for defendant corporation to appear pro se through its president who was not an attorney. Id., 284.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 51-12a
§ 51-12aCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 51-88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/51-88.