Connecticut Statutes
§ 51-199b — Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act.
Connecticut § 51-199b
This text of Connecticut § 51-199b (Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 51-199b (2026).
Text
(a)This section may be cited as the “Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act”.
(b)As used in this section:
(1)“State” means any state of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico or any territory or insular possession subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
(2)“Tribe” means a tribe of Native Americans which is recognized by federal law.
(c)The Supreme Court, on the motion of a party to pending litigation or its own motion, may certify a question of law to the highest court of another state or of a tribe if:
(1)The pending cause involves a question to be decided under the law of the other jurisdiction;
(2)The answer to the question may be determinative of an issue in the pending cause; and (3) The question is one for which no answer
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gross v. Rell
585 F.3d 72 (Second Circuit, 2009)
Barbara C. Ehrlich v. Town of Glastonbury, Joel White, James Kenny
348 F.3d 48 (Second Circuit, 2003)
Lopez v. Smiley
375 F. Supp. 2d 19 (D. Connecticut, 2005)
Munn Ex Rel. C.M. v. Hotchkiss School
795 F.3d 324 (Second Circuit, 2015)
Ellen Devlin v. United States
352 F.3d 525 (Second Circuit, 2003)
Efstathiadis v. Holder
752 F.3d 591 (Second Circuit, 2014)
Robert Lawrence Wolf and Marion Wolf, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Paul J. Yamin, Defendant-Appellee-Cross
295 F.3d 303 (Second Circuit, 2002)
Izzarelli v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
731 F.3d 164 (Second Circuit, 2013)
Fireman's Fund Insurance v. TD Banknorth Insurance Agency Inc.
644 F.3d 166 (Second Circuit, 2011)
Frank A. Caruso v. Siemens Business Communication Systems, Inc., No. 04-1478-Cv
392 F.3d 66 (Second Circuit, 2004)
Victor Cweklinsky, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Mobil Chemical Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
297 F.3d 154 (Second Circuit, 2002)
Ryan v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh PA
692 F.3d 162 (Second Circuit, 2012)
Arrowood Indemnity Co. v. King
605 F.3d 62 (Second Circuit, 2010)
Evanston Ins. Co. v. William Kramer & Assocs., LLC
890 F.3d 40 (Second Circuit, 2018)
Izzarelli v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
767 F. Supp. 2d 324 (D. Connecticut, 2010)
Northfield Insurance Co. v. Derma Clinic Inc.
440 F.3d 86 (Second Circuit, 2006)
Cadle Co. v. Fletcher
804 F.3d 198 (Second Circuit, 2015)
New England Health Care, Employees Union, District 1199 v. Rowland
170 F. Supp. 2d 199 (D. Connecticut, 2001)
Northfield Insurance v. Derma Clinic Inc.
440 F.3d 86 (Second Circuit, 2006)
NEMS, PLLC v. Harvard Pilgrim Health Care of Connecticut, Inc.
(D. Connecticut, 2023)
Legislative History
(P.A. 99-107, S. 1–13, 15.) History: P.A. 99-107 effective June 3, 1999. Section does not provide Connecticut Supreme Court with the ability to review federal questions that are being litigated in the appropriate federal fora, even where claim involves free speech rights that may be coextensive under state and federal constitutions. 254 C. 799.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 51-12a
§ 51-12aCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 51-199b, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/51-199b.