Connecticut § 50a-126 Expert appointed by arbitral tribunal.

Connecticut Statutes

§ 50a-126 — Expert appointed by arbitral tribunal.

Connecticut § 50a-126

Title 50aInternational Law

Ch. 862UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration

This text of Connecticut § 50a-126 (Expert appointed by arbitral tribunal.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 50a-126 (2026).

Text

(1)Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the arbitral tribunal:

(a)May appoint one or more experts to report to it on specific issues to be determined by the arbitral tribunal;

(b)May require a party to give the expert relevant information or to produce, or to provide access to, relevant documents, goods or other property for his inspection.

(2)Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, if a party so requests or if the arbitral tribunal considers it necessary, the expert shall, after delivery of his written or oral report, participate in a hearing where the parties have the opportunity to put questions to him and to present expert witnesses in order to testify on the points at issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(1) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the arbitral tribunal: (a) May appoint one or more experts to report to it on specific issues to be determined by the arbitral tribunal; (b) May require a party to give the expert relevant information or to produce, or to provide access to, relevant documents, goods or other property for his inspection. (2) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, if a party so requests or if the arbitral tribunal considers it necessary, the expert shall, after delivery of his written or oral report, participate in a hearing where the parties have the opportunity to put questions to him and to present expert witnesses in order to testify on the points at issue.