Connecticut Statutes

§ 4a-59 — (Formerly Sec. 4-114). Award of contracts.

Connecticut § 4a-59
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 4aAdministrative Services
Ch. 58Purchases and Printing

This text of Connecticut § 4a-59 ((Formerly Sec. 4-114). Award of contracts.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 4a-59 (2026).

Text

(a)As used in this section, (1) “lowest responsible qualified bidder” means the bidder whose bid is the lowest of those bidders possessing the skill, ability and integrity necessary to faithful performance of the work based on objective criteria considering past performance and financial responsibility, and (2) “highest scoring bidder in a multiple criteria bid” means the bidder whose bid receives the highest score for a combination of attributes, including, but not limited to, price, skill, ability and integrity necessary for the faithful performance of the work, based on multiple criteria considering quality of product, warranty, life-cycle cost, past performance, financial responsibility and other objective criteria that are established in the bid solicitation for the contract.
(b)All

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Green Party of Connecticut v. Garfield
590 F. Supp. 2d 288 (D. Connecticut, 2008)
10 case citations

Legislative History

(1949 Rev., S. 253; 1959, P.A. 258, S. 6; 1967, P.A. 139; P.A. 77-614, S. 96, 610; P.A. 88-18; 88-231, S. 2; 88-297, S. 6; P.A. 90-252, S. 3, 10; P.A. 91-57, S. 3; 91-179, S. 4, 5; P.A. 92-188, S. 3, 4; P.A. 94-126, S. 5; P.A. 95-285, S. 5, 9; P.A. 96-156, S. 2; P.A. 99-213, S. 3; P.A. 01-106, S. 3, 6; P.A. 09-184, S. 3; P.A. 12-205, S. 6; P.A. 14-136, S. 1; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 15-5, S. 157; P.A. 16-184, S. 1; P.A. 18-47, S. 2; P.A. 21-79, S. 3; P.A. 23-137, S. 62.) History: 1959 act substituted “director of purchases” for “supervisor of purchases”; 1967 act allowed consideration of trade-in or resale value; P.A. 77-614 replaced director of purchases with commissioner of administrative services; P.A. 88-18 required preference to be given to in-state supplies, materials, equipment and services, if all other factors are equal; P.A. 88-231 added provision authorizing commissioner to give a price preference for goods made with recycled materials; P.A. 88-297 added provisions re proposals and proposers, authorized life-cycle costs to be considered in determining lowest responsible qualified bidder, and made technical changes; Sec. 4-114 transferred to Sec. 4a-59 in 1989; P.A. 90-252 divided section into Subsecs. adding provisions in Subsec. (a) defining “lowest responsible qualified bidder”, in Subsec. (b) requiring bidders to submit essential information re qualifications and authorizing commissioner to waive minor irregularities and in Subsec. (c) specifying procedure for considering past performance in determining “lowest responsible qualified bidder”; P.A. 91-57 made a technical change; P.A. 91-179 added new Subsecs. (C)(2) and (3) authorizing a price preference for the purchase of a motor vehicle powered by clean alternative fuel and authorizing a price preference for the purchase of conversion equipment; P.A. 92-188 amended Subsec. (c) authorizing a price preference for the purchase of a new motor vehicle or conversion equipment for a vehicle powered by electricity and replaced second set of numeric Subdiv. indicators with alphabetic indicators; P.A. 94-126 amended Subsec. (c) by specifying price and evaluation factors as criteria in Subdiv. (2) and adding provisions re written evaluation of each bid, award of contracts valued at $1,000,000 or more to bidder other than the lowest responsible qualified bidder and annual report of awards made; P.A. 95-285 substituted “Commissioner of Administrative Services or his designee” for “Standardization Committee” in Subsec. (b), effective July 1, 1995; P.A. 96-156 amended Subsec. (c) to require state agencies to include price as a factor in the criteria in the request for proposals; P.A. 99-213 amended Subsec. (c) to authorize the commissioner to give price preferences in determining the lowest responsible qualified bidder for the purchase of recyclable or remanufactured products and to define the terms “recyclable”, “remanufactured” and “remanufacturing” and made technical changes; P.A. 01-106 amended Subsec. (a) by designating definition of “lowest responsible qualified bidder” as Subdiv. (1) and adding Subdiv. (2) defining “highest scoring bidder in a multiple criteria bid”, made technical changes in Subsec. (b), amended Subsec. (c) by adding new Subdiv. (2) re multiple criteria bidding, renumbering former Subdiv. (2) as Subdiv. (3) and applying other provisions to multiple criteria bidding, made a technical change in Subsec. (d) and added Subsec. (f) requiring Commissioner of Administrative Services to adopt regulations re multiple criteria bidding, effective July 1, 2001; P.A. 09-184 added Subsec. (c)(3)(D) re purchase of goods or services from micro businesses, effective July 1, 2009; P.A. 12-205 amended Subsec. (c) to make a technical change and to require awards to be posted on department's web site rather than in annual report, effective July 1, 2012; P.A. 14-136 amended Subsec. (c) by adding “hydrogen or propane” to the definition of “clean alternative fuel”; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 15-5 amended Subsec. (c) by providing an exception from the 10-day deadline to accept a contract for contracts that may be paid for with United States Department of Transportation funds, effective June 30, 2015; P.A. 16-184 amended Subsec. (c)(D) to add provision re 15 per cent price preference exception for a veteran-owned micro business and to define “veteran-owned micro business”; P.A. 18-47 amended Subsec. (c)(D) to define “veteran”; P.A. 21-79 amended Subsec. (c) to redefine “veteran”; P.A. 23-137 amended Subsec. (c) by adding Subpara. (E) re purchase of goods or services from business that employs workforce of which not less than 10 per cent consists of individuals with intellectual disability. Department may reject proposal if it deems such action is in best interests of state; department may consider, in addition to price, past performance of bidder, including skill, ability and integrity; such assessment includes some subjective analysis, which is a wholly permissible exercise of department's discretion and does not amount to favoritism. 93 CA 327.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 4a-59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/4a-59.