Connecticut Statutes
§ 47-76 — Allocation of profits and expenses.
Connecticut § 47-76
This text of Connecticut § 47-76 (Allocation of profits and expenses.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 47-76 (2026).
Text
(a)The common profits of the condominium shall be distributed among the unit owners according to the percentage of the undivided interest in the common elements or be credited to their assessments for common expenses according to the stated percentage, or be used for any other purpose as the association of unit owners decides.
(b)Funds for the payment of current common expenses and for the creation of reserves for the payment of future common expenses and funds for improvements, replacements and additions shall be obtained by assessments against the unit owners in proportion to their percentage interests in the common elements; provided any declarant who owns a unit occupied by a holdover tenant may increase the rent of such tenant only by the amount of any such assessment for the paymen
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Legislative History
(1963, P.A. 605, S. 9; P.A. 76-308, S. 12, 36; P.A. 80-370, S. 3, 9; P.A. 81-319, S. 4, 6.) History: P.A. 76-308 made provision for the division of common profits and assessment of common expenses according to the percentage to undivided interest in the common elements and provided that damage caused by negligence or wilful misconduct shall be specially assessed against the unit owner causing such damages if the condominium instruments so provide; P.A. 80-370 added provisos in Subsecs. (b) and (c); P.A. 81-319 amended Subsec. (b) to clarify that the rent of a holdover tenant may be increased “only” by the amount of any assessment for common expenses not already included in the rent. Cited. 208 C. 318. Subsec. (b): As assessment was valid and calculation to correct the apportionment to each owner was ministerial, defendant's argument that the assessment was invalid has no merit. 114 CA 233.
Nearby Sections
15
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 47-76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/47-76.