Connecticut Statutes

§ 33-929 — Service of process on foreign corporation.

Connecticut § 33-929
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 33Corporations
Ch. 601Business Corporations

This text of Connecticut § 33-929 (Service of process on foreign corporation.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 33-929 (2026).

Text

(a)The registered agent of a foreign corporation authorized to transact business in this state is the corporation's agent for service of process, notice or demand required or permitted by law to be served on the foreign corporation. When the registered agent is other than the Secretary of the State and his successors in office, service may be effected by any proper officer or other person lawfully empowered to make service by leaving a true and attested copy of the process, notice or demand with such agent or, in the case of an agent who is a natural person, by leaving it at such agent's usual place of abode in this state.
(b)A foreign corporation may be served by any proper officer or other person lawfully empowered to make service by registered or certified mail, return receipt request

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. DIRECTBUY, INC.
821 F. Supp. 2d 510 (D. Connecticut, 2011)
15 case citations
Evergreen Media Holdings, LLC v. Warren
105 F. Supp. 3d 192 (D. Connecticut, 2015)
5 case citations
Brown ex rel. Estate of Brown v. CBS Corp.
19 F. Supp. 3d 390 (D. Connecticut, 2014)
4 case citations
Call Center Technologies, Inc. v. Grand Adventures Tour & Travel Publishing Corp.
2 F. Supp. 3d 192 (D. Connecticut, 2014)
4 case citations
Thornton Company v. Pennsak, Inc., No. Cv 98-0490607s (Nov. 20, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 13462 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
2 case citations
Psara Energy, LTD v. Space Shipping, LTD
290 F. Supp. 3d 158 (D. Connecticut, 2017)
2 case citations
Pitruzzello v. Muro, No. X07 Cv00 0072168s (Aug. 22, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 11807 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
Estate of Gartland v. Doucette, No. Cv98 0167971 (Jun. 1, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 7566 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Delvecchio v. Dayton Hudson Corp., No. 430408 (Feb. 22, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 2441 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Nieves v. Tri-State Construction Planners, No. Cv00 0176157 (Feb. 1, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 1888 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
Schwartz v. the Bitter End Yacht Club, No. Cv 97-0398306 (Jul. 15, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 9416 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Williams v. Mhz, Inc., No. X07-Cv02 0079342s (Sep. 17, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 11755 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
Milford Power Co. v. Abb, Ltd., No. X07-Cv02 0078298s (Mar. 26, 2003)
2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 4021 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2003)
LINK GROUP INTERN., LLP v. Toymax (HK) Ltd.
127 F. Supp. 2d 280 (D. Connecticut, 2000)
Schwartz v. Bitter End Yacht Club Int., No. Cv 97 0398306 (Nov. 9, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 14680 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Leonard v. General Motor Company
(D. Connecticut, 2020)
Plimpton v. Bank of Jackson Hole
(D. Connecticut, 2021)

Legislative History

(P.A. 94-186, S. 193, 215; P.A. 96-271, S. 140, 141, 254; P.A. 97-246, S. 36, 99; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 98-1, S. 23, 121.) History: P.A. 94-186 effective January 1, 1997; P.A. 96-271 amended Subsec. (a) to add provision authorizing service to be effected by leaving a copy with the agent or, in the case of an agent who is a natural person, at the agent's usual place of abode and amended Subsec. (c) to make technical changes, effective January 1, 1997; P.A. 97-246 amended Subsec. (a) to provide that the manner of service specified is applicable when the registered agent is other than the Secretary of the State and his successors in office and authorize service by any proper officer or other person lawfully empowered to make service, amended Subsec. (b) to authorize service by any proper officer or other person lawfully empowered to make service, designated as Subsec. (c) provisions formerly part of Subsec. (b) re manner of service when the Secretary of the State has been appointed registered agent and amended said Subsec. to delete provision that limited applicability to service of foreign corporations authorized to transact business in this state, replace “executive offices” with “principal office” and make technical changes, redesignated former Subsec. (c) as Subsec. (d) and amended said Subsec. to make provision re effective date and time of service on the Secretary of the State a separate sentence rather than Subdiv. (4) and make technical changes, redesignated former Subsecs. (d) and (e) as Subsecs. (e) and (f), respectively, added new Subsec. (g) re the manner of service in an action under Subsec. (e) or (f) or in certain actions involving real property and redesignated former Subsec. (f) as Subsec. (h), effective June 27, 1997; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 98-1 made a technical change in Subsec. (c), effective June 24, 1998. Subsec. (f): Subdiv. (1): “To be performed” refers to the performance that the parties to the contract contemplated in the contract, without regard to whether such performance has actually been performed. 329 C. 249. Allegation of negligent misrepresentation qualifies as tortious conduct under Subdiv. (4), but plaintiff failed to present facts sufficient to establish trial court's jurisdiction. 54 CA 506. Foreign corporation may be subject to suit in this state on a cause of action arising out of business solicited in this state or out of tortious conduct in this state; third party complaint against foreign corporation that contained only one conclusory allegation of jurisdictional fact properly dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction because it failed to satisfy burden of establishing that court had personal jurisdiction over foreign corporation. 70 CA 309. When a foreign corporation is authorized to conduct business in this state and appoints a registered agent under Sec. 33-926, it has consented to the exercise of jurisdiction over it by the courts of the state, and nothing in Subsec. limits a court's exercise of personal jurisdiction. 113 CA 845. To empower plaintiff to sue a foreign corporation under the usual place of business prong, this state need not be plaintiff's primary or sole place of business but it must, at the very least, be customary or expected that plaintiff conducts business here; the general long arm jurisdiction provisions of Sec. 52-59b, rather than the corporation specific provisions of Subsec., apply to foreign limited liability companies. 149 CA 513. Because Rhode Island town is not a foreign corporation within the meaning of our general statutes, Subsec. does not confer personal jurisdiction over the town. 192 CA 759. Corporate defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction denied where trial court concluded that defendant provided plaintiffs with employment packets that specified the terms and conditions of employment and defendant had a continuing obligation to ensure that plaintiffs were paid in full compliance with state's minimum wage law. 49 CS 441.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 33-929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/33-929.