Connecticut Statutes
§ 22a-43 — Appeals.
Connecticut § 22a-43
This text of Connecticut § 22a-43 (Appeals.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 22a-43 (2026).
Text
(a)The commissioner or any person aggrieved by any regulation, order, decision or action made pursuant to sections 22a-36 to 22a-45, inclusive, by the commissioner, a district or municipality or any person owning or occupying land which abuts any portion of land within, or is within a radius of ninety feet of, the wetland or watercourse involved in any regulation, order, decision or action made pursuant to said sections may, within the time specified in subsection (b) of section 8-8, from the publication of such regulation, order, decision or action, appeal to the superior court for the judicial district where the land affected is located, and if located in more than one judicial district to the court in any such judicial district. Such appeal shall be made returnable to the court in the
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Demar v. Open Space & Conservation Commission
559 A.2d 1103 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1989)
Watrous v. Town of Preston
902 F. Supp. 2d 243 (D. Connecticut, 2012)
Ross v. New Canaan Environmental Commission
433 F. App'x 7 (Second Circuit, 2011)
Esposito v. Guilford Inland Wetlands, No. Cv99-0427367-S (Jul. 17, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 8415 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Dolengewicz v. Westbrook Inland Wetlands, No. Cv-00-0091548 (May 24, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 6762 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
White v. Milford Inland Wetlands Agcy., No. Cv01 0076419s (Sep. 19, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 11953 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
Kofman v. Inland-Wetlands Commission, No. Cv 94 006884 (Oct. 30, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 12249 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Santini v. Inland Wetlands Commission, No. Cv 96 61840 S (Feb. 7, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 944 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Blue Point v. Inland Wetlands W., No. Cv-99-0087861-S (Aug. 17, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 10217 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Lewis v. Clinton Inl. Wet. Cons. Comm., No. Cv 97-0082443 S (Jan. 5, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 889 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Adams v. Waterford, No. 560751 (Nov. 5, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 14132 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
Moyer v. Westport Conservation Comm., No. Cv01 0185288 S (Feb. 24, 2003)
2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 2467 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2003)
Neubig v. Town of North Haven, No. Cv94-0358268s (May 6, 1994)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 5083 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1994)
Prestige Builders v. Inland Wetlands Comm., No. Cv99 0065764s (Jan. 5, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 95 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Great Oak P. C. A. v. In. wet/water C., No. Cv 94 031 22 33 S (Oct. 1, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 12784 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
Mumford Cove Ass'n v. Town of Groton
647 F. Supp. 671 (D. Connecticut, 1986)
Legislative History
(1972, P.A. 155, S. 8; P.A. 73-571, S. 5, 9; P.A. 76-436, S. 461, 681; P.A. 77-603, S. 13, 125; P.A. 78-280, S. 1, 127; P.A. 84-227, S. 3; P.A. 87-338, S. 8, 11; P.A. 89-356, S. 9; P.A. 91-136; P.A. 95-151, S. 1; P.A. 96-180, S. 76, 166; P.A. 00-108, S. 1; P.A. 01-47, S. 3; 01-195, S. 173, 181; P.A. 02-132, S. 66; P.A. 04-78, S. 2; P.A. 17-48, S. 19.) History: P.A. 73-571 provided that appeals be made within 15 days after publication of regulation, order, etc. rather than in accordance with Secs. 4-166 to 4-184 of the 1971 supplement to statutes, added provisions clarifying nature and effect of appeal and deleted Subsecs. (b) and (c) re assessment of damages and allotment of court costs and re power of commissioner, district or municipality to purchase land and contract with landowners; P.A. 76-436 replaced court of common pleas with superior court and added reference to judicial districts, effective July 1, 1978; P.A. 77-603 amended appeal provisions to specify that in contested cases appeals shall conform to Sec. 4-183 and to clarify venue; P.A. 78-280 deleted references to counties; P.A. 84-227 added Subsec. (b) re a hearing on a motion to dismiss the appeal made by the person who applied for the order, decision or action where each appellant has the burden of proving his standing to bring the appeal, and added Subsec. (c) re a prohibition on withdrawal or settlement without court approval; P.A. 87-338 amended Subsec. (a) to authorize appeals by the commissioner or persons owning or occupying abutting land and to authorize the commissioner to appear as a party to actions brought by other persons; P.A. 89-356 amended Subsec. (a) to replace provision that aggrieved person or abutter “may, within fifteen days after publication of such regulation, order, decision or action appeal to the superior court for the judicial district where the land affected is located, and if located in more than one judicial district, to said court in any such judicial district, except if such appeal is from a contested case, as defined in section 4-166, such appeal shall be in accordance with the provisions of section 4-183” with “may appeal to the superior court in accordance with the provisions of section 4-183”; P.A. 91-136 deleted language that appeal to superior court be in accordance with Sec. 4-183 and substituted language that appeal be taken within the time specified in Subdiv. (b) of such regulation, order, decision or action; P.A. 95-151 amended Subsec. (b) and added Subsec. (d) to provide for appeal of Superior Court's decision in manner provided for appeal of court decisions re zoning appeals; P.A. 96-180 amended Subsec. (d) to change “right of further review” to “right to further review”, effective June 3, 1996; P.A. 00-108 amended Subsec. (a) to make a technical change and add provision re transcripts of meetings; P.A. 01-47 amended Subsecs. (a), (b) and (d) by making technical changes, including changes for purposes of gender neutrality; P.A. 01-195 amended Subsec. (a) to substitute “portion of land within” for “portion of land” and make technical changes, effective July 11, 2001; P.A. 02-132 added new Subsec. (c) re stay of appeal upon commencement of mediation pursuant to Sec. 8-8a, redesignated existing Subsecs. (c) and (d) as Subsecs. (d) and (e) and made technical changes in Subsec. (a) and redesignated Subsec. (d); P.A. 04-78 amended Subsec. (a) by adding provision re requirements for service for purposes of notice to inland wetlands agency applicable to appeals taken on or after October 1, 2004; P.A. 17-48 amended Subsec. (e) to replace reference to Sec. 8-8(p) with reference to Sec. 8-8(o). Rule that party who seeks advantage under a statute or ordinance is precluded from subsequently attacking validity raises question that claim could properly be litigated by appeal; jurisdictional claims are appropriate for resolution by declaratory judgment. 178 C. 173. Cited. 179 C. 250; 180 C. 421; Id., 692; 183 C. 532; 186 C. 67; 196 C. 218; 203 C. 525; 209 C. 544; Id., 652; 212 C. 710; Id., 727; 213 C. 604; 215 C. 616; 216 C. 320; 217 C. 164; 218 C. 703; 219 C. 404; 220 C. 54; Id., 362; Id., 476; 221 C. 46; 222 C. 98; 226 C. 579; 228 C. 95; 229 C. 247; Id., 627; Id., 654; 242 C. 355. Intervenors before inland wetlands commission pursuant to Sec. 22a-19 were entitled to appeal to trial court from commission's decision; plaintiffs' allegations that regulated activities allowed by permit granted to applicant by inland wetlands commission would have specific “deleterious effect” and “impact” on environmental resources were sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss for lack of standing. 289 C. 12. Cited. 4 CA 271; 5 CA 70; 6 CA 715; 7 CA 283; 12 CA 47; 15 CA 336; 18 CA 440. Exception clause applied to state agencies only. 19 CA 713. Cited. 20 CA 309; 24 CA 163; Id., 708; 25 CA 164; Id., 543; judgment reversed, see 222 C. 541; 26 CA 564; 27 CA 214; Id., 590; 28 CA 262; Id., 435; Id., 780; 29 CA 12; Id., 105; 31 CA 105; Id., 599; judgment reversed, see 229 C. 627; 32 CA 799; 34 CA 385; 36 CA 270; 37 CA 166; 43 CA 239. Cited. 35 CS 145; 36 CS 1; 41 CS 184; Id., 444; 42 CS 57. Subsec. (a): Related service of notice on commissioner is not defect that flaws subject matter jurisdiction. 211 C. 416. Cited. 222 C. 541; 242 C. 335. Provisions govern appeals from commission to Superior Court, not proceedings before commission. 30 CA 85. Cited. 31 CA 155. Trial court properly dismissed plaintiff's appeal from decision of municipal conservation commission as the service of process requirements set forth in Sec. 8-8(f) applied to zoning appeals taken prior to October 1, 2004, and consequently plaintiff was required to serve process on commission's chairperson. 101 CA 238. “Publish” and “publication” are not interchangeable terms under Subsec., and although commission did not “publish” notice of its order in a newspaper, “publication” was accomplished; Sec. 22a-44, rather than this section, applies to cease and desist orders. 114 CA 695.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 22a-1
Policy of the state.§ 22a-10
Payment of refunds.§ 22a-101
Municipal coastal programs.§ 22a-105
Coastal site plan reviews.§ 22a-106a
Civil penalty.§ 22a-108
Violations.§ 22a-109
Coastal site plans. Review.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 22a-43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/22a-43.