Connecticut § 22a-21f Rating system for grant applications.

Connecticut Statutes

§ 22a-21f — Rating system for grant applications.

Connecticut § 22a-21f

Title 22aEnvironmental Protection

Ch. 439Department of Energy and Environmental Protection. State Policy

This text of Connecticut § 22a-21f (Rating system for grant applications.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 22a-21f (2026).

Text

For the purpose of making grants, the commissioner shall develop a rating system for applications that will assess the relative merits of proposed projects with emphasis on:

(1)The contribution of the project to the community in resolving outstanding community problems;

(2)The contribution of the project in resolving the special needs of the intended service population;

(3)The contribution of the project in addressing state and national issues;

(4)The evidence of community support for and involvement in the project;

(5)The appropriateness of the project and its probable effectiveness in meeting the stated need;

(6)The planned economic efficiency of the project;

(7)The probable benefits to corps members in self-confidence and self-pride, encouraging the work ethic through job satisfa

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

For the purpose of making grants, the commissioner shall develop a rating system for applications that will assess the relative merits of proposed projects with emphasis on: (1) The contribution of the project to the community in resolving outstanding community problems; (2) The contribution of the project in resolving the special needs of the intended service population; (3) The contribution of the project in addressing state and national issues; (4) The evidence of community support for and involvement in the project; (5) The appropriateness of the project and its probable effectiveness in meeting the stated need; (6) The planned economic efficiency of the project; (7) The probable benefits to corps members in self-confidence and self-pride, encouraging the work ethic through job satisfaction, fostering good work habits, strengthening a sense of community and promoting good community citizenship, facilitating continued or supplementary education; (8) The quality and comprehensiveness of the project and project planning effort as exhibited by the grant application; and (9) The potential of the project to continue beyond the grant period without government subsidy.