Connecticut Statutes

§ 19a-17 — (Formerly Sec. 19-4s). Disciplinary action by department, boards and commissions.

Connecticut § 19a-17
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 19aPublic Health and Well-Being
Ch. 368aDepartment of Public Health

This text of Connecticut § 19a-17 ((Formerly Sec. 19-4s). Disciplinary action by department, boards and commissions.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 19a-17 (2026).

Text

(a)Each board or commission established under chapters 369 to 376, inclusive, 378 to 381, inclusive, and 383 to 388, inclusive, and the Department of Public Health with respect to professions under its jurisdiction that have no board or commission may take any of the following actions, singly or in combination, based on conduct that occurred prior or subsequent to the issuance of a permit or a license upon finding the existence of good cause:
(1)Revoke a practitioner's license or permit;
(2)Suspend a practitioner's license or permit;
(3)Censure a practitioner or permittee;
(4)Issue a letter of reprimand to a practitioner or permittee;
(5)Restrict or otherwise limit practice to those areas prescribed by the board, commission or department;
(6)Place a practitioner or permittee on prob

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moran v. Connecticut Department of Public Health & Addition Services
954 F. Supp. 484 (D. Connecticut, 1997)
5 case citations
American Medical Response v. Efk of Connecticut, No. 451495 (Jun. 27, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 8719 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
State v. Duke, No. Cr 96-161964 (Aug. 8, 1997)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 3145 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)

Legislative History

(P.A. 80-484, S. 137, 176; P.A. 81-473, S. 12, 43; P.A. 82-179; P.A. 83-261; P.A. 86-365, S. 2, 5; P.A. 93-381, S. 9, 39; P.A. 94-174, S. 1, 12; P.A. 95-257, S. 12, 21, 58; P.A. 07-252, S. 5, 39; P.A. 08-137, S. 3; P.A. 11-242, S. 1; P.A. 15-242, S. 16; P.A. 17-10, S. 1; 17-146, S. 7; P.A. 19-118, S. 7; P.A. 22-88, S. 2; P.A. 24-68, S. 33, 35.) History: P.A. 81-473 added a reference to safety of “customers or the public in general”; P.A. 82-179 allowed boards or commissions under the jurisdiction of the department of health services, and the department of health services with respect to professions under its jurisdiction which have no board or commission, to assess civil penalties of up to $1,000; Sec. 19-4s transferred to Sec. 19a-17 in 1983; P.A. 83-261 amended Subsec. (a) to authorize summary revocation of a practitioner's license for conviction of a felony or of improper professional practice in another state and added Subsec. (e) to include certain certifications in the definition of a license; P.A. 86-365 provided for disciplinary action “based on conduct which occurred prior or subsequent to the issuance of a permit or a license”, added references to “permits” and “permittees”, and changed wording of Subsec. (a)(7) and added Subsec. (f) defining “permit” and “permittee”; P.A. 93-381 replaced department of health services with department of public health and addiction services, effective July 1, 1993; P.A. 94-174 amended Subsec. (a)(6) to increase civil penalty from $1,000 to $10,000, effective June 6, 1994; P.A. 95-257 replaced Commissioner and Department of Public Health and Addiction Services with Commissioner and Department of Public Health, effective July 1, 1995; P.A. 07-252 made technical changes in Subsecs. (a) and (b), added new Subsec. (d) authorizing department to resolve any disciplinary action with respect to a practitioner's license or permit by voluntary surrender or agreement not to renew or reinstate, redesignated existing Subsecs. (d), (e) and (f) as Subsecs. (e), (f) and (g), respectively, and made a technical change in redesignated Subsec. (e), effective July 12, 2007, and amended Subsec. (a)(6) to increase maximum civil penalty that boards, commissions and department may assess from $10,000 to $25,000; P.A. 08-137 amended Subsec. (a) by adding new Subdiv. (7) requiring restitution to injured property owners from the specified licensed or certified professionals and by redesignating existing Subdiv. (7) as Subdiv. (8); P.A. 11-242 added new Subsec. (f) re authority to rely upon findings and conclusions of out-of-state disciplinary agencies when taking disciplinary action against practitioner's license or permit and redesignated existing Subsecs. (f) and (g) as Subsecs. (g) and (h), effective July 1, 2011; P.A. 15-242 amended Subsec. (f) by adding “a federal governmental agency”; P.A. 17-10 amended Subsec. (a) by adding new Subdiv. (5) re restricting or otherwise limiting practice to areas prescribed by board, commission or department, and redesignating existing Subdivs. (5) to (8) as Subdivs. (6) to (9); P.A. 17-146 amended Subsec. (a)(8)(B) to add “the federal government,”, and amended Subsec. (f) to replace “a federal governmental agency” with “the federal government”; P.A. 19-118 amended Subsec. (f) by adding reference to Subsec. (d), effective July 1, 2019; P.A. 22-88 amended Subsec. (a)(9)(A) by adding “, except for a practitioner who is a social worker under chapter 383b, an art therapist under chapter 383g, a dietitian-nutritionist under chapter 384b, an embalmer or funeral director under chapter 385, a barber under chapter 386, a hairdresser, cosmetician, esthetician, eyelash technician or nail technician under chapter 387”; P.A. 24-68 amended Subsec. (a)(7) by replacing $25,000 with $10,000, and amended Subsec. (g) by adding Subdiv. (4) re covered licenses and making a conforming change, effective July 1, 2024. Cited. 207 C. 674; 208 C. 492; 211 C. 508; 223 C. 618; 242 C. 1. Standard of proof in cases involving physician discipline before the Connecticut Medical Examining Board is by a preponderance of the evidence. 309 C. 727. Cited. 6 CA 473; 15 CA 205; 24 CA 662; judgment reversed, see 223 C. 618; 34 CA 343; 37 CA 694. It is neither arbitrary nor irrational for legislature to permit board to take disciplinary action against practitioners whom it finds to have acted negligently or unskillfully, and such action does not violate substantive due process. 60 CA 775. Physician disciplinary proceedings, unlike attorney discipline proceedings, are governed by the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act in Ch. 54, and the preponderance of the evidence standard is the appropriate standard of proof in Ch. 54 proceedings. 129 CA 575. Cited. 41 CS 211.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 19a-17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/19a-17.