Connecticut Statutes

§ 17b-600 — (Formerly Sec. 17-109). Optional state supplementation program. Eligibility.

Connecticut § 17b-600
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 17bSocial Services
Ch. 319mmAssistance to the Disabled

This text of Connecticut § 17b-600 ((Formerly Sec. 17-109). Optional state supplementation program. Eligibility.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17b-600 (2026).

Text

The Commissioner of Social Services shall administer a program of optional state supplementation as provided for by Title XVI of the Social Security Act, as amended, and shall administer the program in accordance with the requirements provided therein. In accordance with the requirements of Title XVI of said Social Security Act, optional state supplementation may be provided to aged, blind and disabled individuals who receive supplemental security income benefits or who would be eligible to receive such benefits except for income, provided that any applicant or recipient of optional state supplementation shall be ineligible for such supplementary assistance if such person has made, within twenty-four months prior to the date of application for such aid, an assignment or transfer or other d

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Legislative History

(1949 Rev., S. 2866; 1949, 1951, 1953, S. 1601d; 1957, P.A. 198; 1959, P.A. 627; 1961, P.A. 134; 383, S. 2; 1963, P.A. 69, S. 2; 1967, P.A. 302; 1969, P.A. 297; 1972, P.A. 61; June, 1972, P.A. 1, S. 13; P.A. 73-39, S. 2; P.A. 80-469, S. 2; P.A. 81-214, S. 1; P.A. 83-84, S. 1; P.A. 87-390, S. 2, 4; 87-589, S. 60, 87; P.A. 93-262, S. 1, 87; P.A. 09-73, S. 1.) History: 1959 act added proviso to Subdiv. (e) eliminating former 3-year requirement for assignment or transfer; 1961 acts deleted 1-year residence requirement for eligibility and exception for inmate of almshouse and added provision in Subdiv. (d) that persons whose eligibility is based on having attained age 65 would be eligible for medical institutional care for 42 days; 1963 act added requirement for considering other income and resources in Subdiv. (e); 1967 act removed provision added to Subdiv. (d) in 1961 and added disqualification of being less than 65 in lieu thereof; 1969 act substituted “community correctional center” for “jail”; 1972 acts restated exception in Subdiv. (d) and deleted restriction on eligibility to those 65 or older in excepted institutions; P.A. 73-39 added 7-year limitation relative to property disposition in Subdiv. (e); P.A. 80-469 reduced limitation in Subdiv. (e) to 1 year, referred to disposition of property “for less than fair value” rather than “without reasonable consideration” and clarified duration of ineligibility; P.A. 81-214 increased period of ineligibility in Subdiv. (e) from 1 year to 24 months, revised Subpara. (1) so that ineligibility continues for 24 months after date of “disposition” rather than “application”, added exception re cases where uncompensated value exceeds $12,000, deleted provision allowing commissioner to provide assistance for persons otherwise ineligible under Subdiv. (e) when there is reasonable likelihood of recovering against the transferee pursuant to Sec. 17-83 l , added provisions re presumption of transfer to establish eligibility and re circumstances under which exempt property is subject to provisions of Subdiv. (e); P.A. 83-84 specified applicability to assistance awards “under this chapter”; P.A. 87-390 rewrote the section to change the program from old age assistance to optional state supplementation, changed the eligibility criteria and added the provisions on regulations; P.A. 87-589 required that income maintenance commissioner administer optional supplementation program by substituting “shall” for “may”; P.A. 93-262 authorized substitution of commissioner and department of social services for commissioner and department of income maintenance, effective July 1, 1993; Sec. 17-109 transferred to Sec. 17b-600 in 1995; P.A. 09-73 added provisions requiring commissioner to disregard disposition of assets to a trust in certain circumstances when determining eligibility for optional state supplementation and made a technical change, effective July 1, 2009. Annotations to former section 17-109: Cited. 168 C. 336; 172 C. 292. “Transfer-of-assets” rule violates supremacy clause of the federal constitution by presuming assets are available to welfare recipients which are in fact not available. 176 C. 57. Cited. 211 C. 323. Cited. 32 CS 523. Mother who relinquished life interest in property to sons in return for their agreement to support her “until she dies” held ineligible for old age assistance. 4 Conn. Cir. Ct. 338–343. Cited. 6 Conn. Cir. Ct. 354. Annotation to present section: Trial court properly determined that special needs trust established by plaintiff for the benefit of her son is an asset that department could take into account in determining the son's eligibility for state supplemental assistance benefits; since federal law permits an optional state-funded and state-administered benefits program to adopt eligibility criteria that are more stringent than those that govern the parallel federal program, department's eligibility rules are consistent with federal law. 82 CA 877.

Nearby Sections

15
§ 17b-105e
Definitions.
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 17b-600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/17b-600.