Connecticut Statutes

§ 16-331 — Certificate of public convenience and necessity. Advisory councils. Franchise terms. Regulations. Community needs assessment.

Connecticut § 16-331
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 16Public Service Companies
Ch. 289Broadband Internet Access Service Providers, Community Antenna Television Systems and Competitive Video Service Providers

This text of Connecticut § 16-331 (Certificate of public convenience and necessity. Advisory councils. Franchise terms. Regulations. Community needs assessment.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 16-331 (2026).

Text

(a)No person, association or corporation, or a municipality which owns or operates one or more plants for the manufacture or distribution of electricity pursuant to section 7-213, shall construct or operate a community antenna television system without having first obtained a certificate of public convenience and necessity from the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority certifying that the person, firm or corporation is qualified pursuant to the provisions of subsection (b) of this section to operate such a service within the territory specified in such certificate. The authority may issue more than one such certificate for any franchise area or portion of a franchise area. Notwithstanding the provisions of section 33-645, any such certificate shall authorize the holder thereof to occupy p

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cablevision of Southern Connecticut, Ltd. Partnership v. Smith
141 F. Supp. 2d 277 (D. Connecticut, 2001)
38 case citations
Housatonic Cable Vision Co. v. Department of Public Utility Control
622 F. Supp. 798 (D. Connecticut, 1985)
16 case citations
Westmarc Communications, Inc. v. Conn. Dept. of Public Utility Control
807 F. Supp. 876 (D. Connecticut, 1990)
7 case citations
Charter v. University of Conn., No. X07 Cv 00 0072038 S (Mar. 23, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 3190 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
1 case citations
Hendel's Invest. v. Montville Zoning Bd., No. Cv 97 05434 18 (Mar. 24, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 3351 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Charter Commun. v. University of Ct, No. X07 Cv00 0072038s (Nov. 2, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 13480 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)

Legislative History

(1963, P.A. 425, S. 2, 3; P.A. 75-486, S. 1, 69; P.A. 77-614, S. 162, 610; P.A. 79-533, S. 2, 4; P.A. 80-482, S. 160, 348; P.A. 81-393, S. 1; 81-472, S. 157; P.A. 82-221, S. 2, 3; P.A. 83-49; 83-149; 83-584, S. 2; P.A. 85-292, S. 1; 85-509, S. 6, 11; P.A. 87-415, S. 8, 13; 87-454, S. 1, 3; 87-580, S. 2, 4; P.A. 88-202, S. 1, 10; P.A. 90-12; 90-79, S. 1; P.A. 91-244, S. 1; P.A. 92-137, S. 3–5; 92-146, S. 1, 5; P.A. 94-22, S. 1; 94-83, S. 15, 16; 94-229, S. 2, 4; P.A. 95-17; 95-150, S. 1; P.A. 96-271, S. 162, 254; P.A. 98-121, S. 2, 3; P.A. 00-187, S. 51, 52, 75; P.A. 03-135, S. 23; P.A. 07-253, S. 36–38; P.A. 11-80, S. 1.) History: P.A. 75-486 replaced public utilities commission with public utilities control authority; P.A. 77-614 replaced authority with division of public utility control within the department of business regulation, effective January 1, 1979; P.A. 79-533 provided that certificate grants franchise for unlimited time unless revoked or reassigned in Subsec. (a) and added Subsec. (c); P.A. 80-482 made division of public utility control an independent department and deleted reference to abolished department of business regulation; P.A. 81-393, in Subsec. (a) deleted provision that a certificate grants a franchise for an unlimited period and authorized department to amend certificates to include nonfranchised municipalities, in Subsec. (b) added provisions requiring department to consider concentration of ownership and owners resident in service area and in Subsec. (c) required officer of company to arrange for meeting with advisory council, department to designate advisory council as intervenor and company to provide advisory council with copies of department filings; P.A. 81-472 made technical changes; P.A. 82-221 applied criteria for granting certificate to transfer of existing certificate; P.A. 83-49 amended Subsec. (c) to authorize advisory councils to petition department re service deficiencies; P.A. 83-149 added Subsec. (d), limiting the duration of franchise certificates to 15 years and providing for renewal procedure; P.A. 83-584 amended Subsec. (b) to require department, in reviewing application filed on or after January 1, 1983, for transfer of existing certificate, to consult with advisory council and consider adequacy of service by applicant in other franchise areas and amended Subsec. (d) to allow transferee of certificate issued for initial franchise term to have full 15-year term; P.A. 85-292 divided Subsec. (c) into Subdivs., required, in Subdiv. (1) advisory council regulations to be adopted in accordance with chapter 54, and added Subdiv. (3) re disclosure of advisory council information to subscribers; P.A. 85-509 amended Subsec. (a) to allow more than one certificate to be issued for any franchise area or portion of a franchise area and to delete provision authorizing department to amend certificate to include municipalities not included in any other franchise, amended Subsec. (b) to delete provision requiring department to consider public need for proposed service in determining whether to issue a new certificate or transfer an existing certificate and limited department's consideration to other factors listed in Subsec. (b), amended Subsec. (d)(1) to allow certificate to be renewed if department finds holder has complied with provisions of P.L. 98-549 re certificate renewals, amended Subsec. (d)(2) to require department to adopt regulations for renewals incorporating provisions of P.L. 98-549 and added Subsec. (e) re noncable communications service; P.A. 87-415 amended Subsec. (e) by deleting exception for service authorized by plan implemented in accordance with Sec. 16-247d; P.A. 87-454 amended Subsec. (d)(1) by changing franchise term from 15 years to 5 or 10 years; P.A. 87-580 changed effective date of P.A. 87-454 from July 2, 1987, to June 1, 1988; P.A. 88-202 amended Subsec. (d)(1) to (3) by changing the length of an initial, renewal or transfer franchise term for a term of not less than 5 and not more than 15 years and detailed the factors the department shall consider when granting a 15-year term and amended Subsec. (d)(4) substituting “shall” for “may” concerning the department's promulgation of regulations; P.A. 90-12 added new Subsec. (f) concerning the provision of public access programming, inserted new Subsec. (d)(3) re evaluation of public access programming quality, renumbering remaining Subdivs. accordingly and making technical change in Subsec. (d)(1) to clearly distinguish between public access and educational access; P.A. 90-79 added new Subsec. (h) establishing a community needs assessment; P.A. 91-244 added a new Subsec. (d)(1)(K) requiring analysis of operators performance in providing African-American and Hispanic programming, in Subsec. (d)(4) replaced numeric Subpara. indicators with alphabetic indicators, added a new Subsec. (d)(5)(D) establishing the content of notices sent to subscribers concerning public hearings for franchise renewals, added a new Subsec. (d)(6) requiring a company to provide information concerning franchise renewal proceedings to subscribers and in Subsec. (g) detailed required contents of public access providers report to the department; P.A. 92-137 amended Subsec. (a) by including provision authorizing certain municipalities to operate a cable company, added Subsec. (d)(1)(L) re an operator's good faith effort to provide service to all customers within the service area and Subsec. (d)(5) re standards to ensure all costs and expenses are accurately attributed to a municipal cable company, and added a new Subsec. (i) re terms of certificate of public convenience and necessity for a franchise operating in an area where an existing franchise operates (Revisor's note: The words “subsection (d) of this” were substituted editorially by the Revisors for the reference to “section 16-331” at the end of Subsec. (i), for consistency with statutory language); P.A. 92-146 added provision re advanced educational programming in Subsec. (d)(2) and in Subsec. (d)(5) added a new Subpara. establishing quality standards for instructional and educational programming; P.A. 94-22 changed “public access” to “community access” for consistency, amended Subsec. (d)(1) by describing community access programming, amended Subsec. (d)(3) by adding reference to noncommercial educational broadcast stations and public broadcast stations, amended Subsec. (d)(4) and (5) by replacing references to the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 with references to the Communications Act of 1934, amended Subsec. (f)(1) by adding provision re review of rules, regulations, policies and procedures, amended Subsec. (f)(2) and (5) by deleting “community-based” and “nonprofit” for consistency of reference, added new Subsec. (f)(3) and (4) and renumbered Subsec. (f)(2) and (3); P.A. 94-83 amended Subsec. (e) by deleting “except as provided under section 16-247b” and specified the certificate of public convenience or necessity is “issued pursuant to this section”, effective July 1, 1994; P.A. 94-229 added Subsec. (d)(1)(M) and (n) re availability of devices or services which enable subscribers to voluntarily block transmission and re innovative services, and added Subsec. (j) re financial and infrastructure information, effective June 8, 1994 (Revisor's note: The reference in Subdiv. (N) to the “state legislature” was changed editorially by the Revisors to “the general assembly” for statutory consistency); P.A. 95-17 amended Subsec. (g) by changing community access report date from January first to February fifteenth, but failed to take effect, P.A. 95-150 having taken precedence; P.A. 95-150 deleted former Subsecs. (f) and (g) re community access programming and operations, relettered Subsecs. (h) to (j) as (f) to (h) and in Subsec. (f) added provision re franchise area subject to effective competition; P.A. 96-271 amended Subsec. (a) to replace reference to Sec. 33-286 with Sec. 33-645, effective January 1, 1997; P.A. 98-121 amended Subsec. (c)(1) by changing “officer” to “representative” and amended Subsec. (d)(6) by changing “franchise's advisory council” to “chief executive official”; P.A. 00-187 amended Subsec. (d)(2) to make a technical change and amended Subsec. (d)(5) to substitute the Commission for Educational Technology for a committee that was eliminated under the act, effective July 1, 2000; P.A. 03-135 added Subsec. (i) re nonrenewal for a term of more than 5 years under certain conditions; P.A. 07-253 added Subsec. (d)(7) re capital contributions to upgrade or replace capital equipment, amended Subsec. (f) to change reference for definition of operator's past performance from Sec. 16-333 l (d) to Subsec. (d) of section and add requirement that department state its reasons for not implementing any key recommendations in its final decision and amended Subsec. (g) to provide that certificates may require good faith negotiations re community access television interconnections; pursuant to P.A. 11-80, “Department of Public Utility Control” and “department” were changed editorially by the Revisors to “Public Utilities Regulatory Authority” and “authority”, respectively, effective July 1, 2011. The circumstance of common ownership is a proper consideration in determining the suitability of the applicant by commission; other things being equal, the public interest would best be served by the grant of franchises to independent CATV operators rather than to those financially affiliated with broadcasters. 159 C. 317. Cited. 192 C. 506; 235 C. 334; 242 C. 152. Subsec. (a): The public at large is the beneficiary of Subsec., not incumbent franchisees. 247 C. 95. Subsec. (g): Enacted to protect interests of incumbent cable operators and creates in them a vested interest to be free from unfair competition and does not afford an incumbent standing to claim that it was aggrieved by department's alleged violations of other Subsecs. of section; creates a statutory exception to general rule that creation of competition does not constitute aggrievement to an existing competitor which is limited to analysis of whether terms and conditions of the competing franchise are more favorable than those of the incumbent franchise; a market specific inquiry of each term within incumbent's certificate is not required; department's sole duty is to ensure that specific terms of a competitor's certificate are not more favorable than those of incumbents. 247 C. 95.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 16-331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/16-331.