Connecticut Statutes
§ 16-20 — Inadequate service or unreasonable rates; petition to authority. Small community water system rates and service.
Connecticut § 16-20
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 16Public Service Companies
Ch. 277Department of Energy and Environmental Protection. Public Utilities Regulatory Authority. Office of Consumer Counsel. Miscellaneous Provisions
This text of Connecticut § 16-20 (Inadequate service or unreasonable rates; petition to authority. Small community water system rates and service.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 16-20 (2026).
Text
(a)As used in this section, “private water company” means a corporation, company, association, joint stock association, partnership, other entity or person, or lessee thereof, owning, leasing, maintaining, operating, managing or controlling any pond, lake, reservoir, stream, well or distributing plant or system employed for the purpose of supplying water to not less than two service connections or twenty-five persons, but does not include a municipal waterworks system established under chapter 102, a district, metropolitan district, municipal district or special services district established under chapter 105, chapter 105a or any other general statute or any public or special act which is authorized to supply water, or any other waterworks system owned, leased, maintained, operated, manag
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Legislative History
(1949 Rev., S. 5410; P.A. 75-486, S. 1, 69; P.A. 77-614, S. 162, 610; P.A. 80-482, S. 60, 348; P.A. 81-297, S. 2; 81-358, S. 1; P.A. 97-8; P.A. 98-29, S. 1, 3; P.A. 11-80, S. 1; P.A. 15-89, S. 1.) History: P.A. 75-486 replaced public utilities commission with public utilities control authority; P.A. 77-614 replaced public utilities control authority with division of public utility control within the department of business regulation, effective January 1, 1979; P.A. 80-482 made division an independent department and deleted reference to abolished department of business regulation; P.A. 81-297 required department to hold hearing within 150 days after receiving petition; P.A. 81-358 made petition procedure available to persons residing within general territorial limits of a nonfranchised, nonchartered water company; P.A. 97-8 added as a condition to bringing a petition that no other specific remedy be available in title 16 or in regulations, deleted provision re automatic hearing procedures and added Subdiv. (1) re issuing orders, Subdiv. (2) re ordering hearings or alternate dispute resolution, and provisions holding hearings upon request; P.A. 98-29 added new Subsec. (a) defining “private water company”, designated existing provisions as Subsec. (b) and inserted references to private water companies, effective May 19, 1998; pursuant to P.A. 11-80, “Department of Public Utility Control” and “department” were changed editorially by the Revisors to “Public Utilities Regulatory Authority” and “authority”, respectively, in Subsec. (b), effective July 1, 2011; P.A. 15-89 added Subsec. (c) re small community water system rates and service, effective June 22, 2015. Right to require and considerations proper as to extension of gas main. 91 C. 134. Application of section to telephone service. 99 C. 284. Public utility is not under duty to extend service at regular rates except where reasonable. 114 C. 628. Section is not exclusive remedy; equity may enjoin shutting off of service where there is honest dispute over bill. 123 C. 180. Entitles a person living within a franchised area of utility to an extension of service only when extension of service would be reasonable under the circumstances. 142 C. 359. A public utility company need not provide service without a reasonable payment therefor, and reasonableness of amounts charged ought to be questioned in an administrative proceeding before commission and not in a collateral proceeding. 144 C. 195. Cited. 145 C. 243. Jurisdiction of commission is not exclusive; in action by water company on promissory note where defendants relied on doctrine of unilateral mistake and inequitable conduct in execution of contract, court having obtained jurisdiction should retain it as to whole controversy. 149 C. 442. Cited. 159 C. 327; 169 C. 344.
Nearby Sections
15
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 16-20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/16-20.