This text of California § 72.1. (72.1. (Amended by Stats. 2003, Ch. 525, Sec. 15.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
(a)For purposes of this section, the following terms have the following meanings:
(1)“Central Freeway Replacement Project” is the department and city designated alternative transportation system to the damaged Central Freeway.
(2)“City” is the City and County of San Francisco.
(3)“Freeway Project” includes demolition of the existing commonly known Central Freeway, construction of a new freeway between Mission Street and Market Street, and construction of ramps to, and from, the new freeway.
(4)“Octavia Street Project” is the improvement of Octavia Street from Market Street north as a ground level boulevard.
(b)The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(1)That portion of Route 101 located in the city and commonly known as the Central Freeway was severely damaged in the
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(a)
For purposes of this section, the following terms have the following meanings:
(1)
“Central Freeway Replacement Project” is the department and city designated alternative transportation system to the damaged Central Freeway.
(2)
“City” is the City and County of San Francisco.
(3)
“Freeway Project” includes demolition of the existing commonly known Central Freeway, construction of a new freeway between Mission Street and Market Street, and construction of ramps to, and from, the new freeway.
(4)
“Octavia Street Project” is the improvement of Octavia Street from Market Street north as a ground level boulevard.
(b)
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(1)
That portion of Route 101 located in the city and commonly known as the Central Freeway was severely damaged in the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. This damage to the Central Freeway caused and continues to cause significant traffic congestion.
(2)
Following the Loma Prieta earthquake, the department and the city, with substantial public involvement, selected the Central Freeway Replacement Project as an alternative transportation system to the damaged Central Freeway. The Central Freeway Replacement Project includes the Freeway Project consisting of the demolition of the existing Central Freeway, construction of a new freeway between Mission Street and Market Street, and the construction of ramps to, and from, the new freeway, and the Octavia Street Project, consisting of improvement of Octavia Street from Market Street north as a ground level boulevard. The Central Freeway Replacement Project will remediate traffic congestion problems and allow the city to reclaim unnecessary rights-of-way for beneficial public uses.
(3)
The implementation of an alternative transportation system is in the best interests of the people of the State of California.
(4)
No portions of Route 101 north of Fell Street and south of Turk Street are needed for the Central Freeway Replacement Project or for the proposed alternative project to be placed before the voters as Proposition J in the general municipal election of November 1999.
(c)
(1)
The Legislature recognizes that the Central Freeway Replacement Project adopted by the city’s voters, as local measure Proposition E in November 1998 qualifies for the statutory exemption under Section 180.2.
(2)
The Legislature further recognizes that the proposed alternative project included in Proposition J also qualifies for the statutory exemption under Section 180.2.
(3)
Notwithstanding paragraph (1), any development of property transferred to the city pursuant to this section may, to the extent required by applicable law, require subsequent environmental analysis by the city at the time at which the specific proposals for the use of that property are developed.
(d)
That portion of Route 101 between Market Street and Turk Street is not a state highway, except that if the proposed alternative to the Octavia Street Project is approved by the voters in the general municipal election of November 1999, only that portion of Route 101 between Fell Street and Turk Street is not a state highway.
(e)
The department shall retain jurisdiction over the portion of Route 101 that is between Mission Street and either Market Street or Fell Street, depending on which project is approved by the voters in the general municipal election of November 1999, and shall promptly transfer to the city any portion of Route 101 that is not a state highway under subdivision (d).
(f)
The following shall apply if the voters do not approve the alternative project in the general municipal election of November 1999:
(1)
The city shall utilize any proceeds from the disposition or use of excess rights-of-way for the purpose of designing, constructing, developing, and maintaining the Octavia Street Project until the city’s share of the costs of that project are paid in full or funded from other sources. Upon the full funding of the city’s share of the Octavia Street Project, the city shall utilize any remaining proceeds from the sale of excess rights-of-way solely for the transportation and related purposes authorized under Article XIX of the California Constitution.
(2)
Upon notification to the department by the San Francisco County Transportation Authority that the city is prepared to implement an interim traffic management plan, the department shall proceed expeditiously with demolition of the portion of Route 101 between Fell and Mission Streets. The department shall design and construct the Freeway Project, and the city shall design and construct the Octavia Street Project, and each project shall be consistent with the Central Freeway Replacement Project.