California Statutes
§ 835a. — 835a. (Amended by Stats. 2025, Ch. 241, Sec. 24.)
California § 835a.
JurisdictionCalifornia
Code PENPenal Code - PEN
Title3.
Part 2.TITLE 3. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS REGARDING CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Ch. 5.CHAPTER 5. Arrest, by Whom and How Made
This text of California § 835a. (835a. (Amended by Stats. 2025, Ch. 241, Sec. 24.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cal. Penal Code - PEN Code § 835a. (2026).
Text
(a)The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(1)That the authority to use physical force, conferred on peace officers by this section, is a serious responsibility that shall be exercised judiciously and with respect for human rights and dignity and for the sanctity of every human life. The Legislature further finds and declares that every person has a right to be free from excessive use of force by officers acting under color of law.
(2)As set forth below, it is the intent of the Legislature that peace officers use deadly force only when necessary in defense of human life. In determining whether deadly
force is necessary, officers shall evaluate each situation in light of the particular circumstances of each case, and shall use other available resources and techniqu
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Agnello
259 Cal. App. 2d 785 (California Court of Appeal, 1968)
Garcia v. City of Merced
637 F. Supp. 2d 731 (E.D. California, 2008)
Lawrence v. City & County of San Francisco
258 F. Supp. 3d 977 (N.D. California, 2017)
Jaramillo v. City of San Mateo
76 F. Supp. 3d 905 (N.D. California, 2014)
Ciampi v. City of Palo Alto
790 F. Supp. 2d 1077 (N.D. California, 2011)
Davis v. City of San Jose
69 F. Supp. 3d 1001 (N.D. California, 2014)
Gomez v. City of Whittier
211 F. App'x 573 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Chien Van Bui v. City of San Francisco
61 F. Supp. 3d 877 (N.D. California, 2014)
Chien Van Bui v. City & County of San Francisco
699 F. App'x 614 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
Cherie Harding v. City & County of San Francisco
602 F. App'x 380 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)
Johnson v. Bay Area Rapid Transit
790 F. Supp. 2d 1034 (N.D. California, 2011)
Emmons v. City of Escondido
168 F. Supp. 3d 1265 (S.D. California, 2016)
Bradley W. Ellien v. City of San Jose Paul Salerno
968 F.2d 1220 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
Alexander ex rel. Estate of Quade v. City & County of San Francisco
29 F.3d 1355 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Vieira v. County of Sacramento
(N.D. California, 2020)
Estate of Tyler S. Rushing v. AG Private Protection, Inc.
(E.D. California, 2023)
Paulette Smith v. City of Los Angeles
(C.D. California, 2025)
Rosemary H. Mullins v. County of Fresno
(E.D. California, 2021)
Fajardo v. City of Bakersfield
(E.D. California, 2022)
Hurtado v. State of CA
(E.D. California, 2023)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 2025, Ch. 241, Sec. 24. (SB 857) Effective January 1, 2026.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
California § 835a., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ca/PEN/835a..