(a)Beginning January 1, 2024, the Department of Justice shall develop, issue, and publish “Race-Blind Charging” guidelines for a process whereby all prosecution agencies, for purposes of this section defined as agencies, or branches of agencies, that prosecute criminal violations of the law as felonies or misdemeanors, shall implement a process by which an initial review of a case for potential charging is performed based on information, including police reports and criminal histories from the Department of Justice, from which direct means of identifying the
race of the suspect, victim, or witness have been removed or redacted.
(b)Following the department’s guidelines, prosecution agencies shall independently develop and execute versions of this redaction and review process with th
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(a)
Beginning January 1, 2024, the Department of Justice shall develop, issue, and publish “Race-Blind Charging” guidelines for a process whereby all prosecution agencies, for purposes of this section defined as agencies, or branches of agencies, that prosecute criminal violations of the law as felonies or misdemeanors, shall implement a process by which an initial review of a case for potential charging is performed based on information, including police reports and criminal histories from the Department of Justice, from which direct means of identifying the
race of the suspect, victim, or witness have been removed or redacted.
(b)
Following the department’s guidelines, prosecution agencies shall independently develop and execute versions of this redaction and review process with the following general criteria:
(1)
Beginning January 1, 2025, cases received from law enforcement agencies and suspect criminal history documentation shall be redacted, by the receiving prosecution agency, in order to be used for a race-blind initial charging evaluation, which shall precede the ordinary charging evaluation. This redaction may occur in a separate version of the documents and
may be done mechanically, by hand performed by personnel not associated with the charging of the case, or by automation with the use of computer programming, so long as the method used reasonably ensures correct redaction. The redaction may be applied to the entire report or to only the “narrative” portion of the report so long as the portion submitted for initial review is sufficient to perform that review and the unredacted portions are not part of the initial charging evaluation.
(2)
The initial charging evaluation based on redacted information, including redacted reports, criminal histories, and narratives, shall determine whether the case should be charged or not be charged. Individual charges shall not be determined at this initial charging evaluation stage. Other evidence may be considered as part of this initial charging evaluation so
long as the other evidence does not reveal redacted facts. The initial charging evaluation shall be performed by a prosecutor who does not have knowledge of the redacted facts for that case.
(3)
After completion of a race-blind initial charging evaluation, the case shall proceed to a second, complete review for charging using unredacted reports and all available evidence in which the most applicable individual charges and enhancements may be considered and charged in a criminal complaint, or the case may be submitted to a grand jury.
(4)
(A)
Each of the following circumstances shall be documented as part of the case record:
(i)
The initial charging evaluation determined that the case not be
charged and the second review determined that a charge shall be filed.
(ii)
The initial charging evaluation determined that the case shall be charged and the second review determined that no charge be filed.
(B)
The explanation for the charging decision change shall be documented as part of the case record.
(C)
The documented change between the result of the initial charging evaluation and the second review, as well as the explanation for the change, shall be disclosed, upon request, after sentencing in the case or dismissal of
all charges comprising the case, subject to Section 1054.6 or any other applicable law.
(5)
If a prosecution agency was unable to put a case through a race-blind initial charging evaluation, the reason for that inability shall be documented and retained by the agency. This documentation shall be made available by the agency upon request.
(6)
The county shall collect the data resulting from the race-blind initial charging evaluation process and make the data available for research purposes.
(c)
Each prosecution agency may remove or exclude certain classes of crimes or factual circumstances from a race-blind initial charging evaluation. This list of exclusions and the reasons for exclusion shall be available upon request to
the Department of Justice and members of the public. Due to the increased reliance
on victim or witness credibility, the availability of additional defenses, the increased reliance on forensics for the charging decision, or the relevance of racial animus to the charging decision, each of the following crimes may be excluded from a race-blind initial charging evaluation process:
(1)
Homicides.
(2)
Hate crimes.
(3)
Charges arising from a physical confrontation where that confrontation is captured in video as evidence.
(4)
Domestic violence and sex crimes.
(5)
Gang crimes.
(6)
Cases alleging either sexual
assault or physical abuse or neglect where the charging decision relies upon either a forensic interview of a child or interviews of multiple victims or multiple defendants.
(7)
Cases involving financial crimes where the redaction of documentation is not practicable or is cost prohibitive due to the volume of redactions, including, but not limited to, violations of Sections 368 and 503 and other crimes sounding in fraud consisting of voluminous
documentation.
(8)
Cases involving public integrity, including, but not limited to, conflict of interest crimes under Section 1090 of the Government Code.
(9)
Cases in which the prosecution agency itself investigated the alleged crime or participated in the precharging investigation of the crime by law enforcement, including, but not limited to, the review of search warrants or advising law enforcement in the course of the investigation.
(10)
Cases in which the prosecution agency initiated the charging and filing of the case by way of a grand jury indictment or where the charges arose from a grand jury investigation.