California Statutes
§ 3067. — 3067. (Amended by Stats. 2012, Ch. 43, Sec. 49.)
California § 3067.
JurisdictionCalifornia
Code PENPenal Code - PEN
Title1.
Part 3.TITLE 1. IMPRISONMENT OF MALE PRISONERS IN STATE PRISONS
Ch. 8.CHAPTER 8. Length of Term of Imprisonment and Paroles
Art. 3.ARTICLE 3. Paroles
This text of California § 3067. (3067. (Amended by Stats. 2012, Ch. 43, Sec. 49.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cal. Penal Code - PEN Code § 3067. (2026).
Text
(a)Any inmate who is eligible for release on parole pursuant to this chapter or postrelease community supervision pursuant to Title 2.05 (commencing with Section 3450) of Part 3 shall be given notice that he or she is subject to terms and conditions of his or her release from prison.
(b)The notice shall include all of the following:
(1)The person’s release date and the maximum period the person may be subject to supervision under this title.
(2)An advisement that if the person violates any law or violates any condition of his or her release that he or she may be incarcerated in a county jail or, if previously paroled pursuant to Section 3000.1 or paragraph (4) of subdivision (b) of Section 3000, returned to state prison, regardless of whether new charges are filed.
(3)An advisement th
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Caseres
533 F.3d 1064 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Kriesel
508 F.3d 941 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Valentino Johnson
875 F.3d 1265 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
United States v. King
736 F.3d 805 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
United States v. Lambert Grandberry
730 F.3d 968 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
United States v. Ibrahim Bare
806 F.3d 1011 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)
United States v. Kyle Korte
918 F.3d 750 (Ninth Circuit, 2019)
United States v. Kyle Peterson
995 F.3d 1061 (Ninth Circuit, 2021)
Smith v. City of Oakland
538 F. Supp. 2d 1217 (N.D. California, 2008)
United States v. Christian Estrella
69 F.4th 958 (Ninth Circuit, 2023)
United States v. Jeremy Payne
99 F.4th 495 (Ninth Circuit, 2024)
Barajas v. City of Rohnert Park
159 F. Supp. 3d 1016 (N.D. California, 2016)
United States v. Marcel King
711 F.3d 986 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
Fitzgerald v. City of Los Angeles
485 F. Supp. 2d 1137 (C.D. California, 2007)
United States v. Akin
213 F. App'x 606 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
(PC) Holston v. Viera Rosa
(E.D. California, 2021)
Motley v. Parks
432 F.3d 1072 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Norris
325 F. App'x 522 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Flores
288 F. App'x 365 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
(PC) Robinson v. Willsmore
(E.D. California, 2025)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 2012, Ch. 43, Sec. 49. (SB 1023) Effective June 27, 2012.
Nearby Sections
3
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
California § 3067., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ca/PEN/3067..