California Statutes
§ 28. — 28. (Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 528.)
California·Code PEN Penal Code - PEN·Title 1.·Part 1. TITLE 1. OF PERSONS LIABLE TO PUNISHMENT FOR CRIME
(a)Evidence of mental disease, mental defect, or mental disorder shall not be admitted to show or negate the capacity to form any mental state, including, but not limited to, purpose, intent, knowledge, premeditation, deliberation, or malice aforethought, with which the accused committed the act. Evidence of mental disease, mental defect, or mental disorder is admissible solely on the issue of whether or not the accused actually formed a required specific intent, premeditated, deliberated, or harbored malice aforethought, when a specific intent crime is charged.
(b)As a matter of public policy there shall be no defense of diminished capacity, diminished responsibility, or irresistible impulse in a criminal action or juvenile adjudication hearing.
(c)This section shall not be applicable
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
California § 28. (28. (Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 528.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Crittenden v. Ayers
624 F.3d 943 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Bloom v. Calderon
132 F.3d 1267 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Frisbee
623 F. Supp. 1217 (N.D. California, 1985)
Mitchell Alfred Patterson v. James H. Gomez, Director
223 F.3d 959 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)
Ben-Sholom v. Ayers
674 F.3d 1095 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
Hernandez v. Martel
824 F. Supp. 2d 1025 (C.D. California, 2011)
Roybal v. Davis
148 F. Supp. 3d 958 (S.D. California, 2015)
People v. Whitsett
149 Cal. App. 3d 213 (California Court of Appeal, 1983)
Young v. Gipson
163 F. Supp. 3d 647 (N.D. California, 2015)
Gray Maria v. William Muniz
704 F. App'x 641 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
Crittenden v. Ornoski
(Ninth Circuit, 2010)
97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9655, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15,426 Robert Maurice Bloom v. Arthur Calderon, Warden Attorney General of the State of California
132 F.3d 1267 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
Baca v. Knowles
258 F. App'x 958 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
(HC) Brooks v. Jones
(E.D. California, 2025)
Staggs v. Doctors Hospital of Manteca, Inc.
(E.D. California, 2020)
Tennyson v. County of Sacramento
(E.D. California, 2021)
(HC) Larios v. Alomari
(E.D. California, 2025)
Gonzalez v. Madden
(S.D. California, 2020)
(HC) Kelly v. Newsom
(E.D. California, 2025)
Wolinski v. Moseley
(S.D. California, 2025)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 528. Effective January 1, 2003.