California Statutes
§ 219. — 219. (Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 40, Sec. 8.)
California § 219.
JurisdictionCalifornia
Code LABLabor Code - LAB
Div. 2.DIVISION 2. EMPLOYMENT REGULATION AND SUPERVISION
Part 1.PART 1. COMPENSATION
Ch. 1.CHAPTER 1. Payment of Wages
Art. 1.ARTICLE 1. General Occupations
This text of California § 219. (219. (Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 40, Sec. 8.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cal. Labor Code - LAB Code § 219. (2026).
Text
(a)Nothing in this article shall in any way limit or prohibit the payment of wages at more frequent intervals, or in greater amounts, or in full when or before due, but no provision of this article can in any way be contravened or set aside by a private agreement, whether written, oral, or implied.
(b)The state employer does not violate this section by authorizing employees who quit, or are discharged from, their employment with the state to take payment for any unused or accumulated vacation, annual leave, holiday leave, sick leave to which the employee is otherwise entitled due to a disability retirement, or time off to which the employee is entitled by reason of previous overtime work where compensating time off was given by the appointing power, as provided in Section 201 or 202.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.
509 F.3d 978 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
Burnside v. Kiewit Pacific Corp.
491 F.3d 1053 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
David Valles John Breslin, and Members of the General Public Similarly Situated v. Ivy Hill Corporation
410 F.3d 1071 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Hall v. Live Nation Worldwide, Inc.
146 F. Supp. 3d 1187 (C.D. California, 2015)
Cal. Trucking Ass'n v. Julie Su
903 F.3d 953 (Ninth Circuit, 2018)
Gomez v. J. Jacobo Farm Labor Contractor, Inc.
188 F. Supp. 3d 986 (E.D. California, 2016)
Haralson v. United Airlines, Inc.
224 F. Supp. 3d 928 (N.D. California, 2016)
Lang v. Skytap, Inc.
347 F. Supp. 3d 420 (N.D. California, 2018)
Bonilla v. Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.
407 F. Supp. 2d 1107 (C.D. California, 2005)
McFarland v. GUARDSMARK, LLC
538 F. Supp. 2d 1209 (N.D. California, 2008)
Pellegrino v. Robert Half Internat., Inc.
182 Cal. App. 4th 87 (California Court of Appeal, 2010)
Tlaloc Munoz, Miguel Ruiz, Edgar Corona, and Steven Snavely, individually and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. Earthgrains Distribution, LLC and Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc.
(S.D. California, 2025)
No. 04-57134
491 F.3d 1053 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
Valles v. Ivy Hill Corporation
(Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 40, Sec. 8. Effective May 16, 2002.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
California § 219., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ca/LAB/219..