California Statutes
§ 202. — 202. (Amended by Stats. 2018, Ch. 903, Sec. 20.)
California·Code LAB Labor Code - LAB·Div. 2. DIVISION 2. EMPLOYMENT REGULATION AND SUPERVISION·Part 1. PART 1. COMPENSATION·Ch. 1. CHAPTER 1. Payment of Wages·Art. 1. ARTICLE 1. General Occupations
(a)If an employee not having a written contract for a definite period quits his or her employment, his or her wages shall become due and payable not later than 72 hours thereafter, unless the employee has given 72 hours previous notice of his or her intention to quit, in which case the employee is entitled to his or her wages at the time of quitting. Notwithstanding any other law, an employee who quits without providing a 72-hour notice shall be entitled to receive payment by mail if he or she so requests and designates a mailing address. The date of the mailing shall constitute the date of payment for purposes of the requirement to provide payment within 72 hours of the notice of quitting.
(b)Notwithstanding any other law,
the state employer shall be deemed to have made an immedia
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
California § 202. (202. (Amended by Stats. 2018, Ch. 903, Sec. 20.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.
509 F.3d 978 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
Willner v. Manpower Inc.
35 F. Supp. 3d 1116 (N.D. California, 2014)
Church v. Jamison
50 Cal. Rptr. 3d 166 (California Court of Appeal, 2006)
Norris-Wilson v. Delta-T Group, Inc.
270 F.R.D. 596 (S.D. California, 2010)
Gonzalez v. Millard Mall Services, Inc.
281 F.R.D. 455 (S.D. California, 2012)
McLean v. State of California
377 P.3d 796 (California Supreme Court, 2016)
Sarviss v. General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.
663 F. Supp. 2d 883 (C.D. California, 2009)
Medrano v. D'Arrigo Bros. Co. of California
125 F. Supp. 2d 1163 (N.D. California, 2000)
Meyer v. Irwin Industries, Inc.
723 F. Supp. 2d 1237 (C.D. California, 2010)
Michele Medrano v. Autozone, Inc.
410 F. App'x 24 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Alfred v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.
322 F.R.D. 519 (C.D. California, 2017)
Valenzuela v. Giumarra Vineyards Corp.
614 F. Supp. 2d 1089 (E.D. California, 2009)
Labor Commissioner v. Ramirez (In re Ramirez)
556 B.R. 446 (N.D. California, 2016)
Sandra Garybo v. Leonardo Bros
(E.D. California, 2020)
Hansber v. Ulta Beauty Cosmetics, LLC
(E.D. California, 2021)
Turesa Wilcox v. Harbor UCLA Medical Center Guild, Inc.
(C.D. California, 2023)
Gomez v. J. Jacobo Farm Labor Contractor, Inc.
(E.D. California, 2019)
Sanchez v. Garcia
(E.D. California, 2025)
Walter v. Leprino Foods Company
(E.D. California, 2020)
Mayen v. Cal Central Harvesting, Inc.
(E.D. California, 2021)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 2018, Ch. 903, Sec. 20. (SB 1504) Effective January 1, 2019.