(a)The Legislature hereby finds and declares that due to the delayed implementation of this part due to the California Supreme Court’s ruling in the case California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, some disruption to the intended application of this part and other law with respect to passthrough payments may have occurred.
(1)If a redevelopment agency or successor agency did not pay any portion of an amount owed for the 2011–12 fiscal year to an affected taxing entity pursuant to Section 33401, 33492.140, 33607, 33607.5, 33607.7, or 33676, or pursuant to any passthrough agreement entered into before January 1, 1994, between a redevelopment agency and an affected taxing entity, and to the extent the county auditor-controller did not
remit the amounts ow
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(a)
The Legislature hereby finds and declares that due to the delayed implementation of this part due to the California Supreme Court’s ruling in the case California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, some disruption to the intended application of this part and other law with respect to passthrough payments may have occurred.
(1)
If a redevelopment agency or successor agency did not pay any portion of an amount owed for the 2011–12 fiscal year to an affected taxing entity pursuant to Section 33401, 33492.140, 33607, 33607.5, 33607.7, or 33676, or pursuant to any passthrough agreement entered into before January 1, 1994, between a redevelopment agency and an affected taxing entity, and to the extent the county auditor-controller did not
remit the amounts owed for passthrough payments during the 2011–12 fiscal year, the county auditor-controller shall make the required payments to the taxing entities owed passthrough payments and shall reduce the amounts to which the successor agency would otherwise be entitled pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 34183 at the next allocation of property tax under this part, subject to subdivision (b) of Section 34183. If the amount of available property tax allocation to the successor agency is not sufficient to make the required payment, the county auditor-controller shall continue to reduce allocations to the successor agency under paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 34183 until the time that the owed amount is fully paid. Alternatively, the county auditor-controller may accept payment from the successor agency’s reserve funds for payments of passthrough payments owed as defined in this subdivision.
(2)
If a
redevelopment agency did not pay any portion of the amount owed for the 2011–12 fiscal year to an affected taxing entity pursuant to Section 33401, 33492.140, 33607, 33607.5, 33607.7, or 33676, or pursuant to any passthrough agreement entered into before January 1, 1994, between a redevelopment agency and an affected taxing entity, but the county auditor-controller did pay the difference that was owing, the county auditor-controller shall deduct from the next allocation of property tax to the successor agency under paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 34183, the amount of the payment made on behalf of the successor agency by the county auditor-controller, not to exceed one-half the amount of passthrough payments owed for the 2011–12 fiscal year. If the amount of available property tax allocation to the successor agency is not sufficient to make the required deduction, the county auditor-controller shall continue to reduce allocations to the successor agency under paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of
Section 34183 until the time that the amount is fully deducted. Alternatively, the auditor-controller may accept payment from the successor agency’s reserve funds for deductions of passthrough payments owed as defined in this subdivision. Amounts reduced from successor agency payments under this paragraph are available for the purposes of paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (a) of Section 34183 for the six-month period for which the property tax revenues are being allocated.
(b)
In recognition of the fact that county auditor-controllers were unable to make the payments required by paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 34183 for the period January 1, 2012, through June 30, 2012, on January 16, 2012, due to the California Supreme Court’s ruling in the case of California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, in addition to taking the actions specified in Section 34183 with respect to the June 1 property
tax allocations, county auditor-controllers should have made allocations as provided in paragraph (1).
(1)
From the allocations made on June 1, 2012, for the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule covering the period July 1, 2012, through December 31, 2012, deduct from the amount that otherwise would be deposited in the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund on behalf of the successor agency an amount equivalent to the amount that each affected taxing entity was entitled to pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 34183 for the period January 1, 2012, through June 30, 2012. The amount to be retained by taxing entities pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 34183 for the January 1, 2012, through June 30, 2012, period is determined based on the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule approved by the Department of Finance pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 34179 and any amount determined to be owed pursuant to
this subdivision. Any amounts so computed shall not be offset by any shortages in funding for recognized obligations for the period covering July 1, 2012, through December 31, 2012.
(2)
(A)
If an affected taxing entity has not received the full amount to which it was entitled pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 34183 of the property tax distributed for the period January 1, 2012, through June 30, 2012, and paragraph (1), no later than July 9, 2012, the county auditor-controller shall determine the amount, if any, that is owed by each successor agency to taxing entities and send a demand for payment from the funds of the successor agency for the amount owed to taxing entities if it has distributed the June 1, 2012, allocation to the successor agencies. No later than July 12, 2012, successor agencies shall make payment of the amounts demanded to the county auditor-controller for deposit into the
Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund and subsequent distribution to taxing entities. No later than July 16, 2012, the county auditor-controller shall make allocations of all money received by that date from successor agencies in amounts owed to taxing entities under this paragraph to taxing entities in accordance with Section 34183. The county auditor-controller shall make allocations of any money received after that date under this paragraph within five business days of receipt. These duties are not discretionary and shall be carried out with due diligence.
(B)
If a county auditor-controller fails to determine the amounts owed to taxing entities and present a demand for payment by July 9, 2012, to the successor agencies, the Department of Finance or any affected taxing entity may request a writ of mandate to require the county auditor-controller to immediately perform this duty. Such actions may be filed only in the County of Sacramento and
shall have priority over other civil matters. Any county in which the county auditor-controller fails to perform the duties under this paragraph shall be subject to a civil penalty of 10 percent of the amount owed to taxing entities plus 1.5 percent of the amount owed to taxing entities for each month that the duties are not performed. The civil penalties shall be payable to the taxing entities under Section 34183. Additionally, any county in which the county auditor-controller fails to make the required determinations and demands for payment under this paragraph by July 9, 2012, or fails to distribute the full amount of funds received from successor agencies as required by this paragraph shall not receive the distribution of sales and use tax scheduled for July 18, 2012, or any subsequent payment, up to the amount owed to taxing entities, until the county auditor-controller performs the duties required by this paragraph.
(C)
If a successor
agency fails to make the payment demanded under subparagraph (A) by July 12, 2012, the Department of Finance or any affected taxing entity may file for a writ of mandate to require the successor agency to immediately make this payment. Such actions may be filed only in the County of Sacramento and shall have priority over other civil matters. Any successor agency that fails to make payment by July 12, 2012, under this paragraph shall be subject to a civil penalty of 10 percent of the amount owed to taxing entities plus one and one-half percent of the amount owed to taxing entities for each month that the payments are not made. Additionally, the city or county or city and county that created the redevelopment agency shall also be subject to a civil penalty of 10 percent of the amount owed to taxing entities plus 1.5 percent of the amount owed to taxing entities for each month the payment is late. The civil penalties shall be payable to the taxing entities under Section 34183. If the Department of Finance
finds that the imposition of penalties will jeopardize the payment of enforceable obligations it may request the court to waive some or all of the penalties. A successor agency that does not pay the amount required under this subparagraph by July 12, 2012, shall not pay any obligations other than bond debt service until full payment is made to the county auditor-controller. Additionally, any city, county or city and county that created the redevelopment agency that fails to make the required payment under this paragraph by July 12, 2012, shall not receive the distribution of sales and use tax scheduled for July 18, 2012, or any subsequent payment, up to the amount owed to taxing entities, until the payment required by this paragraph is made.
(D)
The Legislature hereby finds and declares that time is of the essence. Funds that should have been received and were expected and spent in anticipation of receipt by community colleges, schools,
counties, cities, and special districts have not been received resulting in significant fiscal impact to the state and taxing entities. Continued delay and uncertainty whether funds will be received warrants the availability of extraordinary relief as authorized herein.
(3)
If an affected taxing entity has not received the full amount to which it was entitled pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 34183 for the period January 1, 2012, through June 30, 2012, and paragraph (1), the county auditor-controller shall reapply paragraph (1) to each subsequent property tax allocation until such time as the affected taxing entity has received the full amount to which it was entitled pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 34183 for the period January 1, 2012, through June 30, 2012.