California Statutes
§ 996.4. — 996.4. (Added by Stats. 1963, Ch. 1683, Sec. 16.)
California·Code GOV Government Code - GOV·Div. 3.6.·Title 1. DIVISION 3.6. CLAIMS AND ACTIONS AGAINST PUBLIC ENTITIES AND PUBLIC EMPLOYEES·Part 7. PART 7. DEFENSE OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
If after request a public entity fails or refuses to provide an employee or former employee with a defense against a civil action or proceeding brought against him and the employee retains his own counsel to defend the action or proceeding, he is entitled to recover from the public entity such reasonable attorney’s fees, costs and expenses as are necessarily incurred by him in defending the action or proceeding if the action or proceeding arose out of an act or omission in the scope of his employment as an employee of the public entity, but he is not entitled to such reimbursement if the public entity establishes (a) that he acted or failed to act because of actual fraud, corruption or actual malice, or (b) that the action or proceeding is one described in Section 995.4.
Nothing in this se
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
California § 996.4. (996.4. (Added by Stats. 1963, Ch. 1683, Sec. 16.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hall v. California Department of Corrections
835 F. Supp. 522 (N.D. California, 1993)
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5862, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9569 Byrant Allen Freddie G. Helms Rodney Glenn King v. City of Los Angeles v. Stacey C. Koon, Cross-Claimant-Appellant. Byrant Allen Freddie G. Helms Rodney Glenn King v. City of Los Angeles v. Laurence M. Powell, Cross-Claimant-Appellant
92 F.3d 842 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
(PC) Hepner v. County of Tulare
(E.D. California, 2022)
Legislative History
Added by Stats. 1963, Ch. 1683, Sec. 16.