(a)If a city, county, or city and county elects to grant an additional cable television franchise in an area where a franchise has already been granted to a cable television operator, it shall do so only after a public hearing noticed pursuant to Section 6066, in a newspaper of general circulation as defined in Section 6000, where all of the following have been considered:
(1)Whether there will be significant positive or negative impacts on the community being served.
(2)Whether there will be an unreasonable adverse economic or aesthetic impact upon public or private property within the area.
(3)Whether there will be an unreasonable disruption or inconvenience to existing users, or any adverse effect on future use, of utility poles, public easements, and the public rights-of-way contra
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(a)
If a city, county, or city and county elects to grant an additional cable television franchise in an area where a franchise has already been granted to a cable television operator, it shall do so only after a public hearing noticed pursuant to Section 6066, in a newspaper of general circulation as defined in Section 6000, where all of the following have been considered:
(1)
Whether there will be significant positive or negative impacts on the community being served.
(2)
Whether there will be an unreasonable adverse economic or aesthetic impact upon public or private property within the area.
(3)
Whether there will be an unreasonable disruption or inconvenience to existing users, or any adverse effect on future use, of utility poles, public easements, and the public rights-of-way contrary to the intent of Section 767.5 of the Public Utilities Code.
(4)
Whether the franchise applicant has the technical and financial ability to perform.
(5)
Whether there is any impact on the franchising authority’s interest in having universal cable service.
(6)
Whether other societal interests generally considered by franchising authorities will be met.
(7)
Whether the operation of an additional cable television system in the community is economically feasible.
(8)
Such other additional matters, both procedural and substantive, as the franchising authority may determine to be relevant.
(b)
Nothing in this section prevents any city, county, or city and county from considering the approval or denial of an additional cable service franchise in any area of the city, county, or city and county, subject to compliance with subdivision (d), or the imposing of additional terms and conditions upon the granting of the franchise, as the city, county, or city and county determines is necessary or appropriate.
(c)
The city, county, or city and county shall make a final determination as to whether to grant the additional franchise within six months of the application date unless the jurisdiction can establish that the applicant has unreasonably delayed proceedings designed to consider the matters set forth in paragraphs (1) to (8), inclusive, of subdivision (a).
(d)
Any additional franchise granted to provide cable television service in an area in which a franchise has already been granted and where an existing cable operator is providing service or certifies to the franchising authority that it is ready, willing, and able to provide service, shall require the franchisee to wire and serve the same geographical area within a reasonable time and in a sequence which does not discriminate against lower income or minority residents, and shall contain the same public, educational, and governmental access requirements that are set forth in the existing franchise. This subdivision does not apply where all existing cable operators certify to the franchising authority that they do not intend to provide service within a reasonable time to the area to be initially served by the additional franchise.