California Statutes

§ 917. — 917. (Amended by Stats. 2016, Ch. 50, Sec. 33.)

California § 917.
JurisdictionCalifornia
Code EVIDEvidence Code - EVID
Div. 8.DIVISION 8. PRIVILEGES
Ch. 3.CHAPTER 3. General Provisions Relating to Privileges

This text of California § 917. (917. (Amended by Stats. 2016, Ch. 50, Sec. 33.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cal. Evidence Code - EVID Code § 917. (2026).

Text

(a)If a privilege is claimed on the ground that the matter sought to be disclosed is a communication made in confidence in the course of the lawyer-client, lawyer referral service-client, physician-patient, psychotherapist-patient, clergy-penitent, marital or domestic partnership, sexual assault counselor-victim, domestic violence counselor-victim, or human trafficking caseworker-victim relationship, the communication is presumed to have been made in confidence and the opponent of the claim of privilege has the burden of proof to establish that the communication was not confidential.
(b)A communication between persons in a relationship listed in subdivision (a) does not lose its privileged character for the sole reason that it is communicated by electronic means or because persons

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Maurice H. Friedman, United States of America v. Manuel Jacobs
445 F.2d 1076 (Ninth Circuit, 1971)
166 case citations
Kandel v. Brother International Corp.
683 F. Supp. 2d 1076 (C.D. California, 2010)
20 case citations
Taxel v. Equity General Insurance (In Re Couch)
80 B.R. 512 (S.D. California, 1987)
14 case citations
Continental Casualty Co. v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance
265 F.R.D. 510 (E.D. California, 2010)
10 case citations
Great American Surplus Lines Insurance v. Ace Oil Co.
120 F.R.D. 533 (E.D. California, 1988)
10 case citations
Tam v. Qualcomm, Inc.
300 F. Supp. 3d 1130 (S.D. California, 2018)
9 case citations
Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc. v. Great American Insurance
229 F.R.D. 632 (N.D. California, 2005)
6 case citations
Kristopher C. Edwards v. A. Lamarque, Warden
439 F.3d 504 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
5 case citations
Bozzuto v. Cox, Castle & Nicholson LLP
255 F.R.D. 673 (C.D. California, 2009)
3 case citations
ACTION PERFORMANCE COMPANIES, INC. v. Bohbot
420 F. Supp. 2d 1115 (C.D. California, 2006)
1 case citations
Gawel v. Radius Health, Inc.
(S.D. California, 2021)
United States v. Nicholas
606 F. Supp. 2d 1109 (C.D. California, 2009)

Legislative History

Amended by Stats. 2016, Ch. 50, Sec. 33. (SB 1005) Effective January 1, 2017.
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
California § 917., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ca/EVID/917..