California Statutes
§ 788. — 788. (Enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)
California·Code EVID Evidence Code - EVID·Div. 6. DIVISION 6. WITNESSES·Ch. 6. CHAPTER 6. Credibility of Witnesses·Art. 2. ARTICLE 2. Attacking or Supporting Credibility
For the purpose of attacking the credibility of a witness, it may be shown by the examination of the witness or by the record of the judgment that he has been convicted of a felony unless:
(a)A pardon based on his innocence has been granted to the witness by the jurisdiction in which he was convicted.
(b)A certificate of rehabilitation and pardon has been granted to the witness under the provisions of Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 4852.01) of Title 6 of Part 3 of the Penal Code.
(c)The accusatory pleading against the witness has been dismissed under the provisions of Penal Code Section 1203.4, but this exception does not apply to any criminal trial where the witness is being prosecuted for a subsequent offense.
(d)The conviction was under the laws of another jurisdiction and the
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
California § 788. (788. (Enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Richard Boyde v. Jill Brown, Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin
404 F.3d 1159 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Theo Ervin Williams v. Robert Borg, Warden
139 F.3d 737 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
John Gary Arredondo v. George Ortiz
365 F.3d 778 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
Plascencia v. Alameida
467 F.3d 1190 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
People v. Davis
91 Cal. Rptr. 2d 179 (California Court of Appeal, 1999)
People v. Campbell
23 Cal. App. 4th 1488 (California Court of Appeal, 1994)
Ross v. Stranger CA1/2
(California Court of Appeal, 2013)
Boyde v. Woodford
(Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Legislative History
Enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.