California Statutes
§ 2719. — 2719. (Amended by Stats. 1967, Ch. 703.)
California § 2719.
JurisdictionCalifornia
Code COMCommercial Code - COM
Div. 2.DIVISION 2. SALES
Ch. 7.CHAPTER 7. Remedies
This text of California § 2719. (2719. (Amended by Stats. 1967, Ch. 703.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cal. Commercial Code - COM Code § 2719. (2026).
Text
(1)Subject to the provisions of subdivisions (2) and (3) of this section and of the preceding section on liquidation and limitation of damages,
(a)The agreement may provide for remedies in addition to or in substitution for those provided in this division and may limit or alter the measure of damages recoverable under this division, as by limiting the buyer’s remedies to return of the goods and repayment of the price or to repair and replacement of nonconforming goods or parts; and
(b)Resort to a remedy as provided is optional unless the remedy is expressly agreed to be exclusive, in which case it is the sole remedy.
(2)Where circumstances cause an exclusive or limited remedy to fail of its essential purpose, remedy may be had as provided in this code.
(3)Consequential damages may be
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Milgard Tempering, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Selas Corporation of America, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee
902 F.2d 703 (Ninth Circuit, 1990)
In Re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability Litigation
754 F. Supp. 2d 1145 (C.D. California, 2010)
Stearns v. Select Comfort Retail Corp.
763 F. Supp. 2d 1128 (N.D. California, 2010)
Frenzel v. Aliphcom
76 F. Supp. 3d 999 (N.D. California, 2014)
In re Myford Touch Consumer Litig.
291 F. Supp. 3d 936 (N.D. California, 2018)
Rrx Industries, Inc. v. Lab-Con, Inc.
772 F.2d 543 (Ninth Circuit, 1985)
In Re Toyota Motor Corp.
790 F. Supp. 2d 1152 (C.D. California, 2011)
In re Seagate Technology LLC Litigation
233 F. Supp. 3d 776 (N.D. California, 2017)
National Rural Telecommunications Cooperative v. Directv, Inc.
319 F. Supp. 2d 1040 (C.D. California, 2003)
Philippine National Oil Co. v. Garrett Corp.
724 F.2d 803 (Ninth Circuit, 1984)
Hawaiian Telephone Co. v. Microform Data Systems, Inc.
829 F.2d 919 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
Best v. Harris Moran Seed Co.
44 F. Supp. 3d 974 (S.D. California, 2014)
Vance K. Sinclair Mary L. Sinclair v. Coachmen Industries, Inc.
951 F.2d 362 (Ninth Circuit, 1991)
Fontana Products Inc. v. Spartech Plastics Corp.
6 F. App'x 591 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
Eugene Genchev v. Detroit Diesel Corp
608 F. App'x 478 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)
Business Office Inc. v. Golisano
275 F. App'x 578 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
Samarneh v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
(E.D. California, 2025)
Mark Duvall, et al. v. Haier US Appliance Solutions, Inc.
(N.D. California, 2025)
Aureal, Inc. v. I/O Magic Corp. (In Re Aureal, Inc.)
279 B.R. 573 (N.D. California, 2002)
LP Digital Solutions v. Signifi Solutions, Inc.
921 F. Supp. 2d 997 (C.D. California, 2013)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 1967, Ch. 703.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
California § 2719., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ca/COM/2719..