California Statutes

§ 1716. — 1716. (Amended by Stats. 1996, Ch. 397, Sec. 1.)

California·Code CIV Civil Code - CIV·Div. 3. DIVISION 3. OBLIGATIONS·Part 3. PART 3. OBLIGATIONS IMPOSED BY LAW
(a)It is unlawful for a person to solicit payment of money by another by means of a written statement or invoice, or any writing that reasonably could be considered a bill, invoice, or statement of account due, but is in fact a solicitation for an order, unless the solicitation conforms to subdivisions (b) to (f), inclusive.
(b)A solicitation described in subdivision (a) shall bear on its face either the disclaimer prescribed by subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subsection
(d)of Section 3001 of Title 39 of the United States Code or the following notice: “THIS IS NOT A BILL. THIS IS A SOLICITATION. YOU ARE UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO PAY THE AMOUNT STATED ABOVE UNLESS YOU ACCEPT THIS OFFER.” The statutory disclaimer or the alternative notice shall be displayed in conspicuous boldface cap

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

California § 1716. (1716. (Amended by Stats. 1996, Ch. 397, Sec. 1.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Naoko Ohno v. Yuko Yasuma
723 F.3d 984 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
170 case citations
Carijano v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.
643 F.3d 1216 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
137 case citations
Vincent De Fontbrune v. Alan Wofsy
39 F.4th 1214 (Ninth Circuit, 2022)
10 case citations
Garau v. Torrance Unified School District
40 Cal. Rptr. 3d 108 (California Court of Appeal, 2006)
9 case citations
Cariajano v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.
626 F.3d 1137 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
6 case citations
De Fontbrune v. Wofsy
(N.D. California, 2022)
Allen v. Shutterfly, Inc.
(N.D. California, 2020)

Legislative History

Amended by Stats. 1996, Ch. 397, Sec. 1. Effective January 1, 1997.
View on official source ↗