California Statutes
§ 1689. — 1689. (Amended by Stats. 1961, Ch. 589.)
California·Code CIV Civil Code - CIV·Div. 3. DIVISION 3. OBLIGATIONS·Title 5.·Part 2. TITLE 5. EXTINCTION OF CONTRACTS·Ch. 2. CHAPTER 2. Rescission
(a)A contract may be rescinded if all the parties thereto consent.
(b)A party to a contract may rescind the contract in the following cases:
(1)If the consent of the party rescinding, or of any party jointly contracting with him, was given by mistake, or obtained through duress, menace, fraud, or undue influence, exercised by or with the connivance of the party as to whom he rescinds, or of any other party to the contract jointly interested with such party.
(2)If the consideration for the obligation of the rescinding party fails, in whole or in part, through the fault of the party as to whom he rescinds.
(3)If the consideration for the obligation of the rescinding party becomes entirely void from any cause.
(4)If the consideration for the obligation of the rescinding party, before it
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
California § 1689. (1689. (Amended by Stats. 1961, Ch. 589.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United Guaranty Mortgage Indemnity Co. v. Countrywide Financial Corp.
660 F. Supp. 2d 1163 (C.D. California, 2009)
Kelley v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
642 F. Supp. 2d 1048 (N.D. California, 2009)
Bacon v. Wong
445 F. Supp. 1189 (N.D. California, 1978)
Wyler Summit Partnership v. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc.
135 F.3d 658 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
Olam v. Congress Mortgage Co.
68 F. Supp. 2d 1110 (N.D. California, 1999)
Neptune Society Corp. v. Longanecker
194 Cal. App. 3d 1233 (California Court of Appeal, 1987)
Pinel v. AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC
814 F. Supp. 2d 930 (N.D. California, 2011)
Das v. WMC Mortgage Corp.
831 F. Supp. 2d 1147 (N.D. California, 2011)
In Re Acosta
182 B.R. 561 (N.D. California, 1994)
Kucharczyk v. Regents of the University of California
946 F. Supp. 1419 (N.D. California, 1996)
In Re Real Estate Associates Ltd. Partnership Litigation
223 F. Supp. 2d 1109 (C.D. California, 2002)
Dario Martinez-Gonzalez v. Elkhorn Packing Co. LLC
25 F.4th 613 (Ninth Circuit, 2021)
In re Outlaw Labs., LP Litig.
352 F. Supp. 3d 992 (S.D. California, 2018)
Wood v. Apodaca
375 F. Supp. 2d 942 (N.D. California, 2005)
Schuman v. Microchip Tech. Inc.
302 F. Supp. 3d 1101 (N.D. California, 2018)
Michael Cuero v. Matthew Cate
850 F.3d 1019 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
Medina v. Performance Automotive Group, Inc.
841 F. Supp. 2d 1121 (E.D. California, 2012)
Pruco Life Insurance Company v. California Energy Development, Inc.
(S.D. California, 2022)
Brady v. United States of America, Small Business Administr
(N.D. California, 2022)
Platypus Wear, Inc. v. Bad Boy Europe LTD.
(S.D. California, 2020)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 1961, Ch. 589.