California Statutes
§ 9. — 9. (Amended by Stats. 2017, Ch. 561, Sec. 20.)
California·Code CCP Code of Civil Procedure - CCP
When a limitation or period of time prescribed in any existing statute for acquiring a right or barring a remedy, or for any other purpose, has begun to run before this code goes into effect, and the same or any limitation is prescribed in this code, the time that has already run shall be deemed part of the time prescribed as such limitation by this code.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
California § 9. (9. (Amended by Stats. 2017, Ch. 561, Sec. 20.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sandoval v. City of National City
(S.D. California, 2023)
Estate of Jose Alfredo Castro Gutierrez v. Castillo
(S.D. California, 2021)
Reger v. Essex Bank
(E.D. California, 2021)
Hernandez v. Ballaj
(E.D. California, 2024)
Sochil Martin v. La Luz Del Mundo
(C.D. California, 2021)
(PC) Humes v. Yolo County Probation Department
(E.D. California, 2019)
Hadley v. Chaudhari
(E.D. California, 2019)
Gilbert v. Doctor's Choice Modesto LLC
(E.D. California, 2022)
Gastelum v. Cotton On USA, Inc.
(E.D. California, 2023)
Sylvester v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Dept.
(E.D. California, 2023)
Grundig Multimedia AG v. Eton Corporation
(N.D. California, 2021)
HotSpot Therapeutics, Inc. v. Nurix Therapeutics, Inc.
(N.D. California, 2023)
Tawfik v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
(N.D. California, 2021)
Friends of Del Mar Bluffs v. North County Transit District
(S.D. California, 2022)
Lamotte v. State of California
(S.D. California, 2022)
A.A.B. v. City of Porterville
(E.D. California, 2025)
Halper v. Jerome Bennett Friedman, an individual
(C.D. California, 2019)
Petersen v. Natera, Inc.
(N.D. California, 2025)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 2017, Ch. 561, Sec. 20. (AB 1516) Effective January 1, 2018.