California Statutes
§ 6147. — 6147. (Amended (as amended by Stats. 1994, Ch. 479, Sec. 3) by Stats. 1996, Ch. 1104, Sec. 9.)
California § 6147.
JurisdictionCalifornia
Code BPCBusiness and Professions Code - BPC
Div. 3.DIVISION 3. PROFESSIONS AND VOCATIONS GENERALLY
Ch. 4.CHAPTER 4. Attorneys
Art. 8.5.ARTICLE 8.5. Fee Agreements
This text of California § 6147. (6147. (Amended (as amended by Stats. 1994, Ch. 479, Sec. 3) by Stats. 1996, Ch. 1104, Sec. 9.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cal. Business and Professions Code - BPC Code § 6147. (2026).
Text
(a)An attorney who contracts to represent a client on a contingency fee basis shall, at the time the contract is entered into, provide a duplicate copy of the contract, signed by both the attorney and the client, or the client’s guardian or representative, to the plaintiff, or to the client’s guardian or representative. The contract shall be in writing and shall include, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)A statement of the contingency fee rate that the client and attorney have agreed upon.
(2)A statement as to how disbursements and costs incurred in connection with the prosecution or settlement of the claim will affect the contingency fee and the client’s recovery.
(3)A statement as to what extent, if any, the client could be required to pay any compensation to the attor
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Richard M. Rosenthal v. Jane Fonda
862 F.2d 1398 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
Pony v. County of Los Angeles
433 F.3d 1138 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Chaganti v. 12 Phone International, Inc.
635 F. Supp. 2d 1065 (N.D. California, 2007)
In Re Kucek Development Corp.
113 B.R. 652 (E.D. California, 1990)
County of Orange v. Merrill Lynch & Co. (In Re County of Orange)
241 B.R. 212 (C.D. California, 1999)
Knight v. Aqui
966 F. Supp. 2d 989 (N.D. California, 2013)
Sundquist v. Bank of America, N.A. (In re Sundquist)
576 B.R. 858 (E.D. California, 2017)
Doto v. Berryhill
(N.D. California, 2023)
Joseph Padgett v. A. Wright
(Ninth Circuit, 2021)
Neasham & Kramer LLP v. Neff
(E.D. California, 2022)
Padgett v. City of Monte Sereno
(N.D. California, 2019)
Briceno v. Saul
(S.D. California, 2024)
Hanson Crawford Crum Family Law Group, LLP v. Randall
(N.D. California, 2019)
Stein v. Farmers Insurance Company of Arizona
(S.D. California, 2024)
Maxon v. Initiative Legal Group CA1/2
(California Court of Appeal, 2015)
Giles Spellman v. Bradley R. Kirk and Associates
(Ninth Circuit, 2018)
Legislative History
Amended (as amended by Stats. 1994, Ch. 479, Sec. 3) by Stats. 1996, Ch. 1104, Sec. 9. Effective January 1, 1997. Section operative January 1, 2000, by its own provisions.
Nearby Sections
2
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
California § 6147., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ca/BPC/6147..