Arizona Statutes
§ 32-2152 — Action by broker or salesperson to collect compensation
Arizona § 32-2152
This text of Arizona § 32-2152 (Action by broker or salesperson to collect compensation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 32-2152 (2026).
Text
A.An action for the collection of compensation earned may be maintained in the courts of the state by any broker or salesperson. To commence the action the complaint shall allege that the plaintiff was a qualified licensed broker or salesperson at the time the claim arose. Prior to hearing the action the court shall require the plaintiff to prove the alleged qualifications.
B.The commissioner shall not entertain complaints regarding purely civil disputes between licensees concerning the earning, splitting or nonpayment of compensation.
C.Nothing in this section shall be construed to permit the payment or receipt of compensation in violation of sections 32-2155 or 32-2163.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Maganas v. Northroup
537 P.2d 595 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1975)
Weir v. Galbraith
376 P.2d 396 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1962)
Mousa v. Saba
218 P.3d 1038 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2009)
Bonasera v. Roffe
442 P.2d 165 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1968)
Ness v. Greater Arizona Realty, Inc.
572 P.2d 1195 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1977)
Wright v. Hills
780 P.2d 416 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1989)
Hall v. Bowman
357 P.2d 149 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1960)
Farragut Baggage & Transfer Co. v. Shadron Realty Inc.
501 P.2d 38 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1972)
In Re Paul Kun, AKA Pal Kun, Debtor. James L. Hodge and Sue P. Hodge, AKA Oma Suzanne Hodge, Husband and Wife v. Paul Kun, AKA Pal Kun
868 F.2d 1069 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)
Adams Realty Corp. v. Realty Center Investments, Inc.
719 P.2d 291 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1986)
Focus point/kantor v. johnson/oak Acres
330 P.3d 360 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2014)
Realty Executives, Inc. v. Northrup, King & Co.
539 P.2d 514 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1975)
Hyde Park-Lake Park, Inc. v. Tucson Realty & Trust Co.
500 P.2d 1128 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1972)
Bustrum v. Gardner
743 P.2d 5 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1987)
Espil v. Sells
847 F. Supp. 752 (D. Arizona, 1994)
Ck Family Irrevocable v. My Home
(Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2020)
commerce/cra v. Zinke
(Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2014)
Kode v. United Dental Corporation
(D. Arizona, 2024)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 32-1001
Definitions§ 32-1004
Exemptions§ 32-101
Purpose; definitions§ 32-1023
Qualifications of applicants§ 32-1026
Issuance of licenses§ 32-1028
Fees§ 32-103
Qualifications of members§ 32-104
Compensation§ 32-105
OrganizationCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Arizona § 32-2152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/az/32-2152.