Alabama Statutes
§ 15-3-6 — When Time Elapsing Between Preferring of First Charge and Subsequent Indictment Deducted from Time Limitation
Alabama § 15-3-6
This text of Alabama § 15-3-6 (When Time Elapsing Between Preferring of First Charge and Subsequent Indictment Deducted from Time Limitation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ala. Code § 15-3-6 (2026).
Text
When an indictment is lost, mislaid or destroyed, when a judgment is arrested or an indictment quashed for any defect therein, for the reason that it was not found by a grand jury regularly organized, because it charged no offense or for any other cause or when the prosecution is dismissed because of a variance between the allegations of the indictment and the evidence and a new indictment is ordered to be preferred, the time elapsing between the preferring of the first charge or indictment and the subsequent indictment must be deducted from the time limited for the prosecution of the offense last charged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Legislative History
(Code 1852, §597; Code 1867, §4147; Code 1876, §4820; Code 1886, §3715; Code 1896, §5075; Code 1907, §7351; Code 1923, §4935; Code 1940, T. 15, §226.)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 15-1-3
Foreign Language Interpreters§ 15-10-1
Officers Authorized to Make Arrests§ 15-10-110
Definitions§ 15-10-111
Use of Facial Recognition Technology Match Results to Establish Probable Cause or to Make an ArrestCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Alabama § 15-3-6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/al/15-3-6.