Zuniga-Santana v. Stansberry
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7794
ELMER A. ZUNIGA-SANTANA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-488-5)
Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: June 26, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elmer A. Zuniga-Santana, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Elmer A. Zuniga-Santana, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Zuniga-Santana v. Stansberry, No. CA-05-488-5
(E.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zuniga-Santana v. Stansberry (Zuniga-Santana v. Stansberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.