Zuniga-Santana v. Stansberry

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Zuniga-Santana v. Stansberry. Read the opinion of the Court — 187 F. App'x 268
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 26, 2006·No. 05-7794·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7794

ELMER A. ZUNIGA-SANTANA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-488-5)

Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: June 26, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elmer A. Zuniga-Santana, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Elmer A. Zuniga-Santana, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Zuniga-Santana v. Stansberry, No. CA-05-488-5

(E.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zuniga-Santana v. Stansberry, (4th Cir. 2006).

Zuniga-Santana v. Stansberry (Zuniga-Santana v. Stansberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241