Zuniga-Santana v. Stansberry

Fourth Circuit

Zuniga-Santana v. Stansberry

187 F. App'x 268

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 26, 2006·No. No. 05-7794·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Elmer A. Zuniga-Santana, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Zuniga-Santana v. Stansberry, No. CA-05-488-5 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Elmer A. Zuniga-Santana, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Zuniga-Santana v. Stansberry, No. CA-05-488-5 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Zuniga-Santana v. Stansberry, 187 F. App'x 268 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

187 F. App'x 268 (Zuniga-Santana v. Stansberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related