Zuckerman v. Goldstein
952 N.E.2d 1075, 17 N.Y.3d 779, 929 N.Y.S.2d 81, 2011 NY Slip Op 76250, 2011 N.Y. LEXIS 1689
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 23, 2011
DocketMotion No: 2011-410
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 952 N.E.2d 1075 (Zuckerman v. Goldstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Zuckerman v. Goldstein, 952 N.E.2d 1075, 17 N.Y.3d 779, 929 N.Y.S.2d 81, 2011 NY Slip Op 76250, 2011 N.Y. LEXIS 1689 (N.Y. 2011).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rezplex, L.L.C. v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation & Development
952 N.E.2d 1075 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
952 N.E.2d 1075, 17 N.Y.3d 779, 929 N.Y.S.2d 81, 2011 NY Slip Op 76250, 2011 N.Y. LEXIS 1689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zuckerman-v-goldstein-ny-2011.