Rezplex, L.L.C. v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation & Development
This text of 952 N.E.2d 1075 (Rezplex, L.L.C. v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation & Development) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and its certified question answered in the affirmative.
Petitioner’s nonownership of the property where the City repaired a collapsing retaining wall was adequately raised in petitioner’s December 11, 2001 protest, which stated: “We are not aware of any emergency repair done at [petitioner’s] premises.” Thus we need not decide whether the issue was one that could be raised for the first time after the administrative ruling.
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum.
*781 On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
952 N.E.2d 1075, 17 N.Y.3d 779, 929 N.Y.S.2d 81, 2011 NY Slip Op 5546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rezplex-llc-v-new-york-city-department-of-housing-preservation-ny-2011.