Rezplex, L.L.C. v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation & Development

952 N.E.2d 1075, 17 N.Y.3d 779, 929 N.Y.S.2d 81, 2011 NY Slip Op 5546
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 28, 2011
Docket214 SSM 23
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 952 N.E.2d 1075 (Rezplex, L.L.C. v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation & Development) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rezplex, L.L.C. v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation & Development, 952 N.E.2d 1075, 17 N.Y.3d 779, 929 N.Y.S.2d 81, 2011 NY Slip Op 5546 (N.Y. 2011).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and its certified question answered in the affirmative.

Petitioner’s nonownership of the property where the City repaired a collapsing retaining wall was adequately raised in petitioner’s December 11, 2001 protest, which stated: “We are not aware of any emergency repair done at [petitioner’s] premises.” Thus we need not decide whether the issue was one that could be raised for the first time after the administrative ruling.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum.

*781 On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zuckerman v. Goldstein
952 N.E.2d 1075 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
952 N.E.2d 1075, 17 N.Y.3d 779, 929 N.Y.S.2d 81, 2011 NY Slip Op 5546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rezplex-llc-v-new-york-city-department-of-housing-preservation-ny-2011.