Zubair v. ConEdison Company of NY

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided April 21, 2020·No. 1:20-cv-01313·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AHMED HUSAIN ZUBAIR, Plaintiff, 1:20-CV-1313 (CM) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL CON EDISON COMPANY OF NY, et al., Defendants. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: By orders dated February 18, 2020, the Court directed Plaintiff, within thirty days, to resubmit the signature pages of his complaint and his consent to electronic service of Court documents with his original signatures, and either pay the relevant fees to bring this action or submit an amended in forma pauperis (“IFP”) application. Those orders specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of this action. Plaintiff has not submitted the signed signature pages or either paid the fees or submitted an amended IFP application. Accordingly, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915; Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: April 21, 2020 , New York, New York hie. ly Wk COLLEEN McMAHON Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zubair v. ConEdison Company of NY, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Zubair v. ConEdison Company of NY (Zubair v. ConEdison Company of NY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)