Zook v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Opinion
In an action against an insurer, inter alia, to recover damages for its failure to satisfy a judgment obtained against its insured, plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered March 12, 1976, in favor of defendant, upon the trial court’s dismissal of the complaint at a jury trial. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. No fact findings have been presented for review. The factual issues raised at the trial should have been submitted to the jury for resolution. We note, however, that punitive damages are not warranted upon the facts of this case. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
53 A.D.2d 667 (Zook v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.