Zoltar Satellite Alarm Systems, Inc. v. Snaptrack, Inc.

118 F. App'x 501
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided November 24, 2004·No. No. 04-1558, 04-1577·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ON MOTION

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Snaptrack, Inc. et al. move for reconsideration of the court’s October 18, 2004 order dismissing their cross-appeal, 04-1577, for failure to submit the filing fee. Zoltar Satellite Alarm Systems, Inc. opposes. Zoltar moves without opposition for a 30-day extension of time, until December 30, 2004, to file its brief.

Snaptrack has now paid the filing fee. Thus, reinstatement of 04-1577 is appropriate on that ground. We note that Snaptrack has recently filed a motion to dismiss Zoltar’s appeal. Accordingly, the briefing schedule is suspended. See Fed. Cir. R. 31(c).

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Snaptrack’s motion for reconsideration is granted, the dismissal order is vacated, and the mandate is recalled.

(2) Zoltar’s motion for an extension of time is moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zoltar Satellite Alarm Systems, Inc. v. Snaptrack, Inc., 118 F. App'x 501 (Fed. Cir. 2004).

118 F. App'x 501 (Zoltar Satellite Alarm Systems, Inc. v. Snaptrack, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Colida v. Nokia, Inc.
347 F. App'x 568 (Federal Circuit, 2009)
Colida v. Sanyo North America Corp
544 U.S. 966 (Supreme Court, 2005)
Colida v. Sharp Electronics Corp.
125 F. App'x 993 (Federal Circuit, 2005)
Zoltar Satellite Alarm Systems, Inc. v. Snaptrack, Inc.
115 F. App'x 428 (Federal Circuit, 2004)