Zircon Corp. v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Zircon Corp. v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 452 F. App'x 966
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided March 7, 2011·No. 2010-1405·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit ZIRCON CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, ` V. STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC. (FORMERLY THE STANLEY WORKS), Defendant-Appellee. - 2010-1405 Appeal from the United States Dist1'ict Court for the Northern District of California in case no. 09-CV-0042, Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. LaPorte. ON MOTION ‘ ORDER Upon consideration of the motion to reform the official caption, IT ls 0RDERED THAT: The motion is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above

z1RooN v. sTANLEY 2 FoR THE CoURT ll 7 /sf Jan Horbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk ocr Clark S. Stone, Esq. Bryan P. Collins, Esq. 3 rs o 2° “»=¢2s2ss*frt@.@'.~?.:“ HAR 0 7 2011 -1Aummv ama

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zircon Corp. v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Zircon Corp. v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (Zircon Corp. v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.