Zingher v. Vermont Division of Vocational Rehabilitation

165 F.3d 1015
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided February 1, 1999·No. Docket No. 97-6310·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert D. Zingher appeals from Judge Sessions’s dismissal of his complaint because it failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and was barred by res judicata. We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court as enunciated in the recommendations of Magistrate Judge Nied-ermeier. See Zingher v. Yacavone, 30 F.Supp.2d 446 (D.Vt.1997). This decision in no way prejudices Zingher from seeking future services from the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation to which he may be entitled under state or federal law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zingher v. Vermont Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, 165 F.3d 1015 (2d Cir. 1999).

165 F.3d 1015 (Zingher v. Vermont Division of Vocational Rehabilitation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zingher v. Yacavone
30 F. Supp. 2d 446 (D. Vermont, 1997)